I think Paul Mcartney used an Ibanez on "Have a cigar". Since Ibanez is the best bass for metal, clearly he was a metal pioneer.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think Paul Mcartney used an Ibanez on "Have a cigar". Since Ibanez is the best bass for metal, clearly he was a metal pioneer.
I didn't know that The Mothman was a Ibanez...
Part of the reason we think that "our music" is better than the other generations has very little to do with the music. It has more to do with where we were at in our lives at the time that music came out more than any singular quality of the music.
The stuff that I love or have a soft spot for was the metal of the 80's, and by metal I'm not talking Poison and Motley Crue, I'm talking early Metallica, Boltthrower, Iron Maiden, Testament, Anthrax, etc...
The reason that era is what it is for me is because that was when I started playing guitar and bass, and I went through middle school, high school and that awesome point just after high school when you have a full time job and still live with mom and dad. That brief couple of years where you lived like a king with (nearly) zero responsiblities, you had a car, money in your wallet, went to concerts every week, and generally just partied with your friends. That time we refer to as "back in the day"
Thats why we love that music. It was the narrative of that era of our lives before mortgage payments, tedious jobs, having our own families, and all that stuff we call life and adulthood.
Mozart was a bum. Beethoven's where it's at. The "Moonlight Sonata" is the orginal grindcore.
And some people who are deep into that which we call adulthood shouldn't be as worried about what people who aren't there yet are doing.

Part of the reason we think that "our music" is better than the other generations has very little to do with the music. It has more to do with where we were at in our lives at the time that music came out more than any singular quality of the music....
I agree... but there are composers / musicians who have do have profound influence on music and even society...
I think we're on the way to linking grindcore to Kevin Bacon...
What's this gotta do with grindcore????
Great point. It's not like the grindcore guys are out taking gigs away from dance bands![]()
I think we're on the way to linking grindcore to Kevin Bacon...
Is Kevin Bacon the best lyrical subject for metal?
Most people your age don't have arguments that are more often associated with 13 year olds like "x is a better bass player than y" in two completely different eras/genres/etc.
Why would someone need to be your age to know the inherent "rightness" of your argument, anyway?![]()
You wouldn't, this not about age. I am not really sure what this is about, but it's not age.
How could it be about age. For example when I'm looking at a chic, it's not through the eyes of a 57 year old, it's closer to my eyes when I was 16.
You wouldn't, this not about age. I am not really sure what this is about, but it's not age.
How could it be about age. For example when I'm looking at a chic, it's not through the eyes of a 57 year old, it's closer to my eyes when I was 16.
In technical playing? Youre absolutely right. Webster would crush him.
In songwriting? Well Paul certainly had more commercial success since he was in a band marketed to the masses. However Alex had about as much success as humanly possible in his genre as well.
I say for commercial success the beatles obviously win but when looking with respect to the two genres they're about even.. Yes I know that the beatles sold way more albums but Cannibal Corpse wasnt trying to pull in the whole world. They knew they were a sub-genre and were okay with that.
They do what they do and they helped to change metal as it is today.
I think any band including CC (whoever the hell they are) that achieve some level of success has to have at least a couple of intelligent guys associated with the band, I am sure CC didn't just get lucky.
On your other point, and As I mentioned before fast playing especially on bass has never impressed me.Geeez Stanley was one of the guys when I was you guys age. I never dug him, still don't.
Paul's simple bass line on All You Need Is Love" is only a few well place lines in the scale. It means a lot more than someone shredding a bass using a million notes. Seem like a waste of time and talent to me.
Rememeber guys to me, just me.Thats seems to be a hard concept for some of you to grasp.
You wouldn't, this not about age. I am not really sure what this is about, but it's not age.
How could it be about age. For example when I'm looking at a chic, it's not through the eyes of a 57 year old, it's closer to my eyes when I was 16.
This is exactly your problem. You have no idea who he is which is totally fine.
Yet without listening to him you say that you have no interest in him at all.
No I don't, none at all, so he's some guy, classically trained that plays fast, big deal.
And on the other side why would a 17 year old have any interest in Paul McCartney.
Take SNL last Saturday night, my sons watched it with me; all they saw was an old man. All I saw was pure 100% class.
This is exactly your problem. You have no idea who he is which is totally fine.
Yet without listening to him you say that you have no interest in him at all.
No I don't, none at all, so he's some guy, classically trained that plays fast, big deal.
And on the other side why would a 17 year old have any interest in Paul McCartney.
Take SNL last Saturday night, my sons watched it with me; all they saw was an old man. All I saw was pure 100% class.
So now you're generalizing young people. Wow, I guess wisdom doesn't come with age.