All Rosewood for me although not an intentional decision. I've got a maple one on my Sweetwater wish list and, if I ever get a custom bass (Kiesel perhaps), it'll definitely be something a little more interesting than just rosewood or maple.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have more rosewood than maple board basses but like them both. I find the maple board necks to be generally brighter sounding than the rosewood so I tend to string them maple:roundwounds and rosewood:flatwounds (with plenty of exceptions). My basses are exclusively Ps and Js and are mostly "partscasters" so I've done a fair amount of neck swapping in order to optimize playability and tone. Through experimentation, I've found that certain combinations of necks, bodies, and strings just work for whatever reason. I don't question it. I just go with what is optimal.I'm not really a fan of necks with maple boards which I realised the other night looking around my studio.
It got me thinking about how prevalent or otherwise maple board necks are compared to rosewood.
I have 7 basses all of which have rosewood boards..... and zero maple.
Overall my ratio is 7:0
Edit: My electric guitar ratio is 3:1

I said more rosewood. But several maple (4 P's, a Jazz, an ATK, probably a couple of others), ebony, the newer wood choices (can't remember them all), one or two composites. I do love the sound of a P bass with a maple board.I'm not really a fan of necks with maple boards which I realised the other night looking around my studio.
It got me thinking about how prevalent or otherwise maple board necks are compared to rosewood.
I have 7 basses all of which have rosewood boards..... and zero maple.
Overall my ratio is 7:0
Edit: My electric guitar ratio is 3:1