Yet you read all 11 pages.![]()
Not really. The thread title has 'Fender' and 'crazy' in it. I looked at the page count and decided to call it 'crud'. Am I wrong? No need to answer.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yet you read all 11 pages.![]()
It wasn't obvious at all. In fact, what you're saying is absurd.
I don't know what leads you to believe that people with strong views would be crippled by the notion of creating music. Logically, one would assume that an opinionated, aggressive person would be exactly the type of person to do this kind of thing. People who make heated arguments for either side of a point aren't necessarily concerned with what other people think. They're expressing their viewpoint, which by definition is the opposite of "insecure". They feel secure enough in what they think to put their thoughts in print for all to see. Insecure people don't do this. They usually say nothing.
This is a public forum. The entire point of this site, and all others like it, is to encourage discussion. It's an intellectual excercise going back thousands of years in human history. You partake in a public debate, and the reader decides who has the stronger position. Hell, I've been involved in heated discussions on TB where I came in with one viewpoint and left with the opposite. This because I felt the person(s) making the opposite point had a stronger argument.
I've played arena shows with a bass that cost $100 and a bass that cost $1500. I clearly win.

The only person that I care about what bass they play and if its cheap or expensive is me, because I'm the one who had to pay the dollars and I'm the one who has to stand on stage with it.
Well, And Jimmy, I care about his basses too.
You know, if Fender charges too much for a bass or a guitar, I'm sure that the general public will let Fender know by not buying it.
+1. Most of you guy's & gal's on here could play circles around me with a SX or any other "cheap" bass no matter if I had I $10,000 bass. I use a 89' Peavey Foundation because it is a good USA made bass & it was in my price range
Not really. The thread title has 'Fender' and 'crazy' in it. I looked at the page count and decided to call it 'crud'. Am I wrong? No need to answer.
What I think is crazy about Fender is now costs $4000 and takes a "Masterbuilder" to replicate what was originally put together by unskilled Mexican girls in the 1950's.
That's crazy!
Don't feed the trolls. It's the old TalkBass standard of thinking you are better, having played in your mom's basment for years, than someone who has sold millions of records.![]()
The fact is that it does NOT require this to replicate those mass-produced basses. Some of them were good, some not so good - just like today's Fender models. The 70's Fenders are well known to be good & bad, and it's constantly commented upon here that there is variation.
I have never been convinced that it's worth spending the money for the higher-end Fenders when the MIMs are good, solid instruments that can easily have pickups or hardware swapped.
The key is to get a good one, then work with it.
Keep polishing those turds - I'm sure the 10 drunks at the local watering holes you typically play at are impressed by them
- georgestrings
Yeah, I know - for example, bassbully isn't being very forthcoming: a look at a couple of threads he started reveal that playing music just isn't very important to him:
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f67/fading-away-1012921/
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f67/old-band-reforming-need-help-1037932/
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f30/if-you-ever-sold-gear-tb-i-need-advice-1013051/
Just sayin'...
- georgestrings
What I think is crazy about Fender is now costs $4000 and takes a "Masterbuilder" to replicate what was originally put together by unskilled Mexican girls in the 1950's.
That's crazy!
What in homer's heck does that have to do with the gear you or I play?
Yup I decided to buy a boat and move on but might be playing again soon....not sure. After 11 years of my crappy scene I'm pretty burned out....what's your point?
I think you are kinda getting to like me? Maybe you might miss me.......hummmmmm?
BTW the drunks from the corner bar you play at said you sounded better when you used to play your cheap Squiers.
I have a $ 3,500 Bass, another $ 2,000 bass , $1, 000 amp and $ 1,000 cab... I play in my bedroom and church. There 1000's people like me, we spend thousands dollars because we can, does not mean that we care about music, we have other priorities in life, damn, I have spent more money in basses in the last two years than Steve Harris that tours the world with a crappy Fender MIA ( he changed the original bridge and pickups for a reason)
That's because for the vast majority of the time, it just isn't true - it's more a fantasy born of those who can't/won't spend more money to obtain a higher quality instrument... So, they attempt to convince *themselves* that their cheaper basses are "as good or better" than their more expensive counterparts, with that tired old line of BS...
The truth is, spending more money will nearly always get you a better instrument - although the law of diminishing returns comes into play, as the *gains per dollar* will generally get smaller as you go up the ladder... I say, buy the best instrument you can comfortably afford, then enjoy it - and don't worry about it any more...
Best of luck in your search,
- georgestrings

And that, IMO, is a huge misconception that cheaper basses absolutely must be modded in order to make them even just usable. In my experience with an SX Ursa 1 and two Squier VMs. they were good to go right out of the box (aside from a string change and maybe a slight tweak to the setup). The only changes I made were strictly cosmetic. On y $110 SX Ursa1 all I did ws replace the white PG with a $10 black one I bought from Rondo. The bass sounded terrific, it played like a dream, and all the hardware worked as well as it should. Sure, it wasn't effect, but any flaws it had were not related to the actual function of the bass, so, IMO, were totally irrelevant.You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.
I think what also plays in to the confusion is not how MUCH bass you can buy, but how MANY basses can you buy with your limited funds and then justify their price/quality. One just needs to take a stroll through the Essex (SX) or 'Rickenfakers' threads to see this behavior in action...
BTW, I have nothing against cheap basses, but there is a law of diminishing returns when you buy a $100 SX P-bass and trick it out with 8x that amount in hardware/pups/TI flats, etc. If you need to make upgrades costing multiples more than you paid for the bass new, then your money is better spend upgrading to a better bass.
![]()