TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's kind of funny. My high school had an old Univox ES335 copy that was donated to the music department. Sadly, the Arts Department faculty thought the guitar was too valuable to let the students play unless under STRICT supervision. I didn't take lessons at school but was always playing with bands and friends in the designated practice spaces. Regardless of how much interest I showed I was never allowed to play the thing. So, I don't always buy the 'donate' argument.Wait what am I saying. If I gave it to a school the students would smash it to bits!!!
It's kind of funny. My high school had an old Univox ES335 copy that was donated to the music department. Sadly, the Arts Department faculty thought the guitar was too valuable to let the students play unless under STRICT supervision. I didn't take lessons at school but was always playing with bands and friends in the designated practice spaces. Regardless of how much interest I showed I was never allowed to play the thing. So, I don't always buy the 'donate' argument.
To be honest, the kid looks pretty damn sad - as if He messed up really bad or someone in the audience was teasing him throughout the entire song.
No, I don't say that it's a reason to smash a perfectly fine bass - that is NEVER ok imho - but still... The ways of the youth has been looked upon with dismay and
horror since the days of Socrates ("The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise.")![]()
not impressed by either display. If you read Pete Townshend's autobiography, he describes his guitar smashing as something that felt artistic at the moment, but that quickly became a trap--something audiences expected even if he didn't feel like it. Townshend soon began to tire of the whole thing, and the constant smashing of guitars is one reason why the band was so deep in debt in its early years, despite its success. It wasn't until Tommy that they made enough money to sustain themselves.
Kinda dumb to destroy any instrument that's still functional; if you're not happy with it sell it or donate it to a charity/school program. Call me what you will but I couldn't help but feel that when Jimi Hendrix and The Who would trash their gear that it was pointless and moronic.
And yet people still talk about it many years after the fact. Maybe not so pointless.
I spent a week in Havana last year and saw lots of fantastic musicians - almost all of them playing on gear that was only remarkable because of a) how cheap it was and, b) how there was inevitably something wrong with it (broken hardware, missing pieces, two strings of the same gauge, etc.). But these people make it work because they have no other choice if they want to play. When I see the kind of senseless destruction of instruments demonstrated in the OP's videos I can't help but think of those musicians in Havana - and it makes me sad.
I know there have been various initiatives to do such a thing, though I'm not sure how successful any of them are/were. Any time I know someone who is going to Cuba (a popular destination for Montrealers) I ask if the person would mind taking some strings (or straps or cables) to donate to musicians there. I know that Janek Gwizdala had a used string program going for a while but that seems to have disappeared.If it's not a thing already we should start a free instrument program to take donations and buy instruments to spread across the globe.