• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is a bass player really necessary?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.

Even for TalkBass, this is a pretty weird thread.
 
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.
All you need in any sort of decent successful band is bass and drums. Literally nothing but bass and drums. Rythym and timing. Everything, EVERYTHING else is simply just filler. Melody, lyrics, ambiance = filler. Rythym and timing makes it music. Even acoustic guitar and vocals, with nothing else, is rythym and filler, or pointless noise. Oh, and bass sounds exponentially better than a guitar hitting low notes. Guitars sound like trash after low B. And it never gets close to the fullness. No matter how you tweak your amp settings, pedals, etc.

So in conclusion,
Yes, a bass player is half the important parts of a band. And no, you are not important at all.
 
5852aeef96a20.image.jpg
 
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.
You do know that this is a bass forum, right? :whistle:
 
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.
Well, he may have a point...after all, Prince did tracks without bass, such as "When Doves Cry".. but let's not spread that around okay!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.