yeah about this IEEE test. First off 12 people is hardly a realistic statistical pool to draw conclusions from. If I got 12 people in a room and asked them their birthdates, I am pretty sure at least a few clumps would occur around various astrological signs. We all know Libras and Sagitarians are more likely to respond to CL ads for focus groups right? So if we have 3 libras and 2 Sagitarius, that leaves only 7 people to represent the other 10 signs of the zodiac. Of course there will be at least 3 left out.
So our little test to find out how zodiac sign affects tapioca preference is out the door!
When I worked in market research a study was a failure if we could not get a statistical base that numbered in the low thousands. When we collected data we screened participants to be sure our sample matched the composition of the population.
White males aged 35-50 never want to participate. Females over 60 and males/females under 25 were no problem.
When evaluating for audio you would want to be sure to cover several age groups. Age affects hearing. You would also want to screen for occupational disqualifiers. Jack hammer operators, punch press operators etc, would likely have impaired hearing.
With a sample as low as 12 I cant help but think this was the typical kind of conference hijinks that are used to lighten up the often dry proceedings. Hee hee can YOU tell tube from soild state? Besides, this kind of thing belongs in AES not IEEE.
PS I do not condone the usage of astrological signs for divination or decision making. But Aries are all jerks.
So our little test to find out how zodiac sign affects tapioca preference is out the door!
When I worked in market research a study was a failure if we could not get a statistical base that numbered in the low thousands. When we collected data we screened participants to be sure our sample matched the composition of the population.
White males aged 35-50 never want to participate. Females over 60 and males/females under 25 were no problem.
When evaluating for audio you would want to be sure to cover several age groups. Age affects hearing. You would also want to screen for occupational disqualifiers. Jack hammer operators, punch press operators etc, would likely have impaired hearing.
With a sample as low as 12 I cant help but think this was the typical kind of conference hijinks that are used to lighten up the often dry proceedings. Hee hee can YOU tell tube from soild state? Besides, this kind of thing belongs in AES not IEEE.
PS I do not condone the usage of astrological signs for divination or decision making. But Aries are all jerks.
Anyhow, most pro sound engineers know the correct and well-established procedure to mic a Leslie through the FoH. With correct mic placement you can absolutely capture the close-up horn doppler effect. This has never posed a problem for Jon Lord, Keith Emerson, Rick Wakeman, Booker T. playing the biggest halls on the planet. Never heard (or heard of) them? 