• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is global warming fake?

...Or humanity at large can still try to reduce the crap we let out into the world regardless of whether global warming is real or not.

It's one thing to have responsible stewardship. It is another matter when one considers the mass-hysteria being promulgated by the media and others with near-religious fervor.
 
The absence of the one has resulted in the other...

Some see the threat of irreversibly damaging the world that our grandchildren inherit as an issue to become quite adamant about.

But, according to some, it's never enough. Whatever we do is never enough.

I remember in the 70's pollution was going to kill us all. In the 80's and 90's the hole in the ozone was going to kill us all.

I'm not saying there aren't legitimate concerns regarding the environment. It's the hysteria and the hypocrisy that I've had enough of.
 
But, according to some, it's never enough. Whatever we do is never enough.

I remember in the 70's pollution was going to kill us all. In the 80's and 90's the hole in the ozone was going to kill us all.

I'm not saying there aren't legitimate concerns regarding the environment. It's the hysteria and the hypocrisy that I've had enough of.
Gotta agree with you on that one.
 
"... Gray, who shares in the Nobel Prize awarded to the UN IPCC..."

I think he was more than a "peer reviewer"

So, these guys are respectable scientists as long as they reach the "right" conclusions?

His name included because he is/was a part of the project. He volunteered to review the findings, methodology & data, that's peer review. To my knowledge he did not contribute any research or spend any time in the labs working on modeling or drilling ice cores, he reviewed the work of others. He disagrees, that's all well and good, he's entitled to his opinion. One would however, need to balance his opinion, background, past & present funding and career path, against the majority view, when making your own judgment about the credence to lend to it.
 
Killer Heat Waves, Deaths Due To Climate Change, Severe Diseases

or this:

Invalid Link Removed

or:

Invalid Link Removed

and

Disasterous effects

How's that for a start?


EDIT: Dang! Beaten by Need4

What's this supposed to prove? That if you go to websites like celticsurf.net instead of getting your information straight from credible sources, you'll be more afraid? Touche, I guess.

Global warming is dangerous for the planet. It's a simple factual statement. If you see it as hysterical, that's your problem.