• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is this the laziest generation?

+1.

I'm 24 and pretty much feel the same about the current situation in our country. My generation has watched an economic crisis unfold that could have been prevented had our government actually regulated the banking industry. And on the other side of that coin, we've watched how already rich investors and bankers will do whatever they can to profit, even if it means profiting off people loosing their homes and their way of life. We're seeing what happens when corporations are allowed to support and influence politicians. It's not just the banking industry, it's the private prisons that lobby and push to keep absurd penalties in place to keep their prisons full, it's the food industry that fights against honest labeling of genetically modified food that fights to keep harmful preservatives in the food we eat. It's the pharmaceutical industry that's allowed to take part in writing laws, and who lobby extensively to keep their dangerous, side effect ridden drugs on the market.

The result of all this corporate sway over our governments regulatory bodies is that people develop health problems from the food they eat, pharma companies keep making money off that reality, banks and investors are allowed to push millions into poverty and millions more to the edge of the cliff and we have the largest prison population of any other country on the planet. Because of scams our government allowed the banks and investors to pull, the economic reality now for a lot of people my age is that people can't live out of their parents house unless they are living with 3 people per house. Forget about living on your own. A lot of people I know have jobs they hate and would like out of but can't because there is nowhere else to go. Going to school doesn't mean you get a job like we were told our whole lives... now the reality is that you get out of school and you might have a pile of loans to pay off for the next decade because that's the only way you could "afford" to go to school in the first place. The reality is current and future generations can look forward to a standard of living that is lower than their parents thanks to government corruption and corporate greed.

This is all the fault of generations before us and it'll be our fault too if we do nothing about it.

Not the most concise, but this is an internet forum. But yeah, I agree with your assessment here.
 
TheVoiceless said:
Right now their is a man/woman in their 60's-80's using their fortune to oppress progress to ensure their investments won't be affected by a new technology that renders their monopoly useless. This is the down fall of a greedy society.

Don't fool yourself, cars can be built today that can get 70MPG, brakes that last 200,000 miles, tires that don't blow or deflate, and cars that have built in sensors almost guaranteeing that you would not get into an accident.

Heck, we don't even have a real space program anymore, so much for dreaming about being an astronaut.

Metal Matt adds some nice fuel to the fire with for profit prisons and millionaire welfare. Civil war is coming to the US, when is the question.

Your post makes me have an unquenching desire to enjoy a delicious Crystal Pepsi.
 
Choosing to be a bum isn't a "path" it's a dead end. The only path is a "CAREER" path. Welfare, general assistance, SSI for things as idiotic as alcoholism or being "bi-polar" are the downfall of the lazy generation. 100 years ago you had to work DAMN hard to barely get by. Now you can hold your hand out and barely get by. Is it any wonder the world sees us as anything but fat and lazy? In 100 short years we've gone from innovators and a can-do attitude to professional pan handlers and no end of enablers.

It's really simple. If you're not a productive member of society, you're a mouth breather, using up my air.

So maybe a little back ground into what I do for a living yeah? I'm the Vocational Process Coordinator for the largest employer of folks with disabilities in the US. These are the hardest working folks you will ever meet. My job, specifically is to make sure that folks with disabilities have the opportunity to work no matter what their challenges might be. This isn't "pretend" work either. Last year we won the distributor of the year from HP. THAT is huge. Of all their vendors, we took it. My GUYS took it with all the cards supposedly stacked against them. I have a fella with Down Syndrome who has worked since he was 18 ( 26 years with us ). He turned 46 this year. Know what he talks about? Retiring at 60. He shows up every day and loves what he does. Work instills a sense of worth in a person. Sitting on your ass sucking on the government tip doesn't allow for any perspective what-so-ever. That's why you see shows with people on the "system" with xbox360,ps3,gameboy,20 inch rims,big screen tvs and live in a ramshakle with kids that are hungry. If they earned that money they would learn the value of it. And no, this isn't a racial deal. All creeds are accounted for in lazy town.

As for my gals "kid", why should he have a job? Because he hasn't moved up into the mountains to live like Grizzly Adams. That's why.

Sorry, but you can't get Social Security disability for alcoholism or substance addiction if the abuse is material to the impairment. Congress changed the laws back in the 90's. The only way an alcoholic or drug addict could get SSI is if their disability would still remain even if they were sober and clean, and even then that's a long shot.

Also 70 to 80 per cent of SSI claim applications are denied. Those who get it right away are truly disabled and the rest of the truly disabled who were rejected and get it, usually have to hire a lawyer and get a hearing before an Admistrative Law Judge. Even having legal representation is no guarantee of getting SSI. I'm weary of hearing myths about SSI and those who get it. On another note, I am inspired by those disabled persons you've helped to find gainful employment.
 
Sorry, but you can't get Social Security disability for alcoholism or substance addiction if the abuse is material to the impairment. Congress changed the laws back in the 90's. The only way an alcoholic or drug addict could get SSI is if their disability would still remain even if they were sober and clean, and even then that's a long shot.

Also 70 to 80 per cent of SSI claim applications are denied. Those who get it right away are truly disabled and the rest of the truly disabled who were rejected and get it, usually have to hire a lawyer and get a hearing before an Admistrative Law Judge. Even having legal representation is no guarantee of getting SSI. I'm weary of hearing myths about SSI and those who get it. On another note, I am inspired by those disabled persons you've helped to find gainful employment.

I don't doubt what you say is true at all. The person I am specifically remembering was from the late 80's early 90's. I wasn't aware they made the change and am glad you cleared up my inadvertent misinformation.

As for my job. I love it. I mean that truly. I was at Intel ( Folsom ) for a good long time and while it afforded me the toys I enjoy so much, it was killing me. I have 3 kids, two have disabilities. It seemed a natural progression to me. I went to school, got my masters and joined the rehabilitative services field. I would, and will, never do anything outside of this field. It's where my heart is. I am one of the very lucky few that wakes up eager to head to work. :bassist:

If ya live in this area I'd be happy to show you around our little slice of heaven :)
 
Sorry, but you can't get Social Security disability for alcoholism or substance addiction if the abuse is material to the impairment. .

Wrong. My cousin was/is a heroin addict. He "hears voices" and most doctors say he burned himself out with the drugs....he is on total full disability for a irreversible mental condition. He takes meds for it...and when he stops...he starts hearing the voices.

He was once rushed to the ER for blood poisoning from a needle site that had become festered. He is a great looking guy with a good personality....I am related to him through my wife and have known him since before he abused himself.

Such a terrible waste.

To get back to your post, I know a couple people who worked themselves into mental breaks that are now on full and total disability. The rules ALWAYS have exceptions.
 
I don't doubt what you say is true at all. The person I am specifically remembering was from the late 80's early 90's. I wasn't aware they made the change and am glad you cleared up my inadvertent misinformation.

As for my job. I love it. I mean that truly. I was at Intel ( Folsom ) for a good long time and while it afforded me the toys I enjoy so much, it was killing me. I have 3 kids, two have disabilities. It seemed a natural progression to me. I went to school, got my masters and joined the rehabilitative services field. I would, and will, never do anything outside of this field. It's where my heart is. I am one of the very lucky few that wakes up eager to head to work. :bassist:

If ya live in this area I'd be happy to show you around our little slice of heaven :)

Sounds like you are doing a very good work indeed. Thanks for the invite, but I doubt if if I'll be in your neck of the woods anytime soon. The next time this Nebraska boy heads west, it'll be northward to see relatives in Seattle.
 
I can't be sure what generation we're talking about anymore, but let me break it down. I'm 23, and work about 12 hours a day (or more) as a sailor in the US Navy. I work hard for my money and have even before the military. Prior to the Navy, I was a chef in a restaurant making even less and sometimes longer hours. I'm not alone either, so if you're labeling my generation lazy, you're looking in the wrong places.
 
My take on the subject, FWIW. The whole of mankind has, ever since the beginning, been impulsively driven to "make life easy". Machines and technology have BURIED some very rudimentary and fundamental "tasks" that were once commonplace, tedious, and undesireable. Ever mowed your lawn with a manual mower? Ever edged with hand clippers or a hatchet? Ever been on a roof adjusting a TV antenna? Shoveled snow? Canned your own vegetables/preserves? Who the heck hand washes their own car anymore? The reason that "generations", as it were, are perceived as "more lazy", is because every new generation has something LESS to do to get along - and are HAPPY to NOT have to do it!!

While I was growing up, my Dad fixed EVERYTHING. Why? We lived in an 800 sq ft, three bedroom, single story house, four boys and parents, two blocks from the railroad tracks. We had LITTLE money. My Dad changed the clutch, fixed the mower, did gardening, fixed small appliances, worked on the car, built cabinets, built a porch on the back of the house, built a shed in the yard, dug post holes and built a fence, painted his car (along with doing bodywork), installed a gas lamp in the front yard, built flower boxes, built bunkbeds, laid carpet, remodeled the bathroom, hung wallpaper, changed toilets, installed a shower, etc.etc.. I LEARNED this from him - and as an adult, do WHATEVER I CAN in my own home. I have fixed the washer, fixed the dryer, fixed our A/C control system after a lightning storm, fixed my big screen TV, fixed the toilet, fixed our kitchen sink, installed a microwave, etc. Yes, I am gainfully employed and can afford to have these things done. Why should I PAY when I can do it myself? Because I SHOULD.

And, this propensity towards laziness is fueled by the conveniences that allow for laziness. With 24 hour TV, the internet, PS3, IPODs, and school programs that have eliminated PHYS ED, there are SOO many distractions! Yup, why climb a tree? Why ride a bike? Why learn to ski? Why play an instrument? Why learn to fish? Aside from the fact that kids are not SAFE anymore to go outside and ride bikes all hours until the sun goes down because of the sickos, why go outside and exert yourself at all? Rubbish! When you can sit in front of a big screen and do ALL OF THESE THINGS as a simulation, in the safety and comfort and cleanliness of your home, why? They are LAZY, they gain weight, and then the liberal media tells everyone to point a finger at the fast food companies. I call BS. If it looks like a duck....

Coming full circle, the whole of humankind wants to be lazy. We have done it to ourselves. Many today ALLOW their children to be lazy so that they don't have to "SUFFER" like they did. And, kids learn it's OK. They learn it's good. They learn to love comfort and convenience. And then, they enter their adult lives completely and utterly unequipped for anything - unless they have a fat bank account. Sad.

Am I against technology and convenience? Not at all. But if children are GIVEN a life of ease, and are taught nothing about self-sustainance, they'll gain little more than a raw sense of dissatisfaction and helplessness when they are TRULY faced with situations that REQUIRE initiative, creativity, imagination, fortitude, strength. You know, LIFE.

Is THIS the laziest generation? Maybe....

Chris
 
Wrong. My cousin was/is a heroin addict. He "hears voices" and most doctors say he burned himself out with the drugs....he is on total full disability for a irreversible mental condition. He takes meds for it...and when he stops...he starts hearing the voices.

He was once rushed to the ER for blood poisoning from a needle site that had become festered. He is a great looking guy with a good personality....I am related to him through my wife and have known him since before he abused himself.

Such a terrible waste.

To get back to your post, I know a couple people who worked themselves into mental breaks that are now on full and total disability. The rules ALWAYS have exceptions.

Sorry but you are wrong on this. His mental condition now exists regardless of his using or not using. It is an irreversible condition at this point, and thus his addiction becomes immaterial. He would not have gotten SSI if it could be established that his underlying impairment would improve or go into remission upon ceasing his drug use. The same rules would apply to an active alcoholic who develops an underlying impairment leading to disability, even if caused by alcohol, that has progressed to where it becomes permanent and irreversible, and not drinking, or drinking, is no longer material to their case. Not being able to work because ones abuses alcohol or drugs, in and of itself, does not qualify as a disability any longer as it did in the past. It's the legal question of if substance abuse is material or not material to a disability these days.
 
Sorry but you are wrong on this. His mental condition now exists regardless of his using or not using. It is an irreversible condition at this point, and thus his addiction becomes immaterial. He would not have gotten SSI if it could be established that his underlying impairment would improve or go into remission upon ceasing his drug use. The same rules would apply to an active alcoholic who develops an underlying impairment leading to disability, even if caused by alcohol, that has progressed to where it becomes permanent and irreversible, and not drinking, or drinking, is no longer material to their case. Not being able to work because ones abuses alcohol or drugs, in and of itself, does not qualify as a disability any longer as it did in the past. It's the legal question of if substance abuse is material or not material to a disability these days.

Sheesh.... He is on disability. The state doctors who examined him put him in the hospital. He was there for 6 months. He was treated by the state. We visited him in a State institution. This is not debatable. This is fact.
 
Aside from the fact that kids are not SAFE anymore to go outside and ride bikes all hours until the sun goes down because of the sickos,

I just wanted to close in on that part. I don't think there are any more sickos in the world now than they have been in the past, just we have global media now.

Decades past, you wouldn't be aware of anything other than massive news, outside of your own area. Now we hear about what happens all over the world, doesn't mean it is happening more often, just that people are more aware.
 

Latest posts