• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

I have old ears. I can't tell the difference between strung thru-body or top load.
I just can't.
I can barely tell the difference in tone between a J and P bass these days.
Play what you like and makes you happy.


Ha...

We are getting old huh Gman!???

Sad but true....

I know I need various parts replaced....ear drums works be nice.... My hearing is off... not so much for to musical issues but work issues .
 
Hello,
I own a Lakland Skyline Lined Fretless 55-02. I was considering upgrading to a Lakland 55-94 lined fretless. Will I really notice a discernible difference between the two instruments. I own a fretted Lakland 55-94
My Skyline has a bone nut as I had it replaced. Granted the pickups are different on my 55-94 since they are Bartolini's, but to my ears, while there is a difference, it's not huge. Granted others will disagree. Just
interested in what folks think.

Having had both...I can say... The sound will not be much different ( well... Yes if you consider the Lakland vs Bart's but...apples to apples....no).

But the feel will be different..... Mostly on the neck feel.... Also... It might be lighter.

Your choice.... But you can never go wrong buying a 5594!!!
 
Compromising the string integrity if its not designed for the sharper bend when going thru body is worse than any tone change from bridge mounting. I like DR Legends through bridge for flats.
Yes! So far, I’ve tried to only use very pliable flats or ones with a known history of being able to withstand the stress. Like Gary said, I too can’t hear a difference though. I string thru body the majority of the time to use up string length so I can keep only the silk (or skinny part) on the E tuner. My Stingray Classic bridge forces me to always string thru body though.
 
Hello,
I own a Lakland Skyline Lined Fretless 55-02. I was considering upgrading to a Lakland 55-94 lined fretless. Will I really notice a discernible difference between the two instruments. I own a fretted Lakland 55-94
My Skyline has a bone nut as I had it replaced. Granted the pickups are different on my 55-94 since they are Bartolini's, but to my ears, while there is a difference, it's not huge. Granted others will disagree. Just
interested in what folks think.
You can expect a US to weigh less with (I assume) hand selected body woods, more attention to finer details, and fretwork that’s done by hand as opposed to a PLEK.

In my many conversations with Carl (he’s a patient man) he has mentioned picking musical body blanks and knocking on the wood to hear the tones. That’s part of why many of the US Laklands I’ve owned have been truly special instruments, they just sing!
 
Hahaha awesome! I'm definitely in the right group! Can't wait to get my Lakie!

We're very friendly... And we have cookies!!!!

bd1-2.jpg
 
Hahaha awesome! I'm definitely in the right group! Can't wait to get my Lakie!

Careful! This lot is a bad influence. I started with a 55-02 in March of 2018 which I still have but I also now have a 55-94, 55-14, 2x55-60, 2x55-64, and a 55-01. And that’s not even counting several I’ve flipped!

But I’m good now...I’m fairly certain of it. ;):laugh:
 
Careful! This lot is a bad influence. I started with a 55-02 in March of 2018 which I still have but I also now have a 55-94, 55-14, 2x55-60, 2x55-64, and a 55-01. And that’s not even counting several I’ve flipped!

But I’m good now...I’m fairly certain of it. ;):laugh:

These are not the basses you're looking for!

We are a friendly lot.... Really we are!!!

:)
 
Bone. Like the bridge stringing, I can’t hear a difference: brass, bone, plastic, or tusq.
I thought the benefits to bone, graphite and tusq were they are self-lubricating and the strings don’t bind. I’ve only heard of sound differences with brass nuts (similar to a zero fret), but never tired one to tell. Billy Sheehan used to use them, but would always say he had to squirt graphite in the slots to stop the strings from catching (especially on his e string because of the d-tuner), but now his signature basses have plastic nuts, so who knows? Realistically unless you’re playing an open string, it’s a moot point.

As for stringing through body vs bridge, I’ve heard some people think the tension is different, I don’t know if I can tell. I like the look of thru the body better, and with a non-quick release bridge (like our beloved Laklands) there’s less chance of nicking the finish with the ball end if you’re being careless and rushing (I speak from experience :banghead: ), but Lakland doesn’t recommend flats thru body due to the break angle, although some guys in here have done it with no issues. If you really want to get deep on it, read this Philthy Thoughts – String-Through vs Top Loader? | Bass Gear Magazine

And I never got any cookies when I joined...:spit:
 

Latest posts