Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Line 6 HX Stomp
- Thread starter been_effected
- Start date
Thank you for adding those and for the work you have done. The info you have posted has made a big diffrence in my settings.
My pleasure, glad you guys are diggin the site!
ok I have a routing question.
I use my stomp with path A as clean path (with a sans) and path B with all my effects, coming together at the end.
is there any way I can still do this, but split the outputs, one with an added cab sim on it, one without?
i want to add a cab sim to an out so i can send it to our desk for IEMs and one without a sim to send to my amp.
i know the possibilities for the stomp are nearly endless, but am i asking a little too much from it ?
I use my stomp with path A as clean path (with a sans) and path B with all my effects, coming together at the end.
is there any way I can still do this, but split the outputs, one with an added cab sim on it, one without?
i want to add a cab sim to an out so i can send it to our desk for IEMs and one without a sim to send to my amp.
i know the possibilities for the stomp are nearly endless, but am i asking a little too much from it ?
I haven't actually done this myself, so I might be wrong. But, I think the end of your signal path would need to be the mixer for A&B, Send block for your amp, then cab sim, then output.
Nope. One split only, so this won't work sadly.
If there was a way to use the dual cab block and leave one side empty/blank, that would be a great solution. Someone should suggest that on Ideascale.
use a send block: main out get amp+cab, send out gets DI
(I believe you could make use of the FXLoop send)
(I believe you could make use of the FXLoop send)
BOOM!! that is perfect thank you! that has made my day... and saved my wallet from buying a pre with cab sim , which would defeat the point of scaling down my board with the stomp.
Wait, I didn't follow this... How are you setting this up? Do you still get a signal if you just place a block after a send? I always figured a send block routed your entire signal to the send output, like a standard FX send on an amp.
Aplogies for apparently giving the wrong info above. Two years of deep editing presets and this thing still has surprises for me.
The Dry Thru parameter adjusts the level that passes through the Send block.
That's awesome! I've only used the Send/Return combo block, so this was news to me. I'm sure I can find some use for this information
@Naigewron as Poke says. so if I understand the OP he'd put a [Send] block after FX, and before AMP+Cab
In — [FX] — [Send] —[AMP] — [CAB] — MainOut gets cab amp
— — — — SendOut gets FX only
the routing possibilities are amazing!
In — [FX] — [Send] —[AMP] — [CAB] — MainOut gets cab amp
— — — — SendOut gets FX only
the routing possibilities are amazing!
It took me a while to reorient my approach with the HX FX. Instead of asking what can it do, I started to ask, what do I want to achieve? So far, no matter what I have dreamed up, The HX has revealed a way to deliver.
Yeah, every time I tell myself I'd really like to ditch the HX Stomp from my live board and go with individual pedals, I take a closer look at what the Stomp actually allows me to do with just 2-3 main presets. It's still right there on my board.
