TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If you're tone deaf, lined would be better.
If you are tone deaf how can you play music at all ?
Again?
it's always gonna be a thing as long as:Not this crap again.

...it’s your personal preference. Just have fun!![]()
lines help a lot if lines help a lot. it's not a case of one size fits all, but you're right, IMO: "It isn’t like once you have a line that you don’t correct the notes to be in tune …"this debate is stupid. Lines helps a lot. It isn’t like once you have line that you don’t correct the notes to be in tune …

shut it down...the master has spoken
I suck equally well on both line and unlined fretless. And I'm proud of it!I'm evidently stupid, tone deaf, or just plain suck. I like my lined fretless. Without the lines, I'd be lost.
This is true for me also. I switched to fretless on an unlined Warwick but as my playing evolved and I found myself wanting to include some multi-notes it was difficult to keep accurate intonation. I never went all the way to full lines but side markers at each fret position were a very big help.If lines matter, it is because of diads, double stops and chords. For me, my ability to play multiple notes at once, in tune, does improve with lines. Why? I don't know. And I still play chords when playing an unmarked board. But I simply don't feel as confident. Maybe that'll come in time.



