BUT HERES THE REAL POINT. PLAYING IN TUNE TAKES SKILL, AND GOOD PLAYERS PLAYING LINED FRETLESS ARE GOING TO USE THEIR EARS TO CONTROL THE NOTE EXACTLY AS MUCH AS AN UNLINED PLAYER
edit: actually, no, it’s probably more likely that a lined fretless player will be MORE in tune, since they have a visual reference against which they make adjustments. My 13th ‘fret’ Ab is marked a little sharp- now I know that, and after establishing a better position, I can now play that position Every. Single. Time. And I’m still allowed to use my ears. Amazing.
‘Oh but mr eddododo, wizards like Tony Franklin have dialed in their unlined instruments for decades, they can play laser in-tune on the DOWNBEAT.’
Huh… I guess lined fretless players don’t also get better at their instrument over time. What a bummer. Also…. It’s not like Tony Franklin played all of his downbeat in tune in that very video… I think it sounded fine, which is kind of the other part of my point, whether or not small variations in intonation, especially brief ones, are noticeable, we do know unequivocally that in the example given, Franklin didn’t even play everything in tune. So if being perfectly in tune matters, unlined fretless still aren’t better. If being perfectly in tune DOESN’T matter, which is often doesn’t, unlined fretless still isn’t better
It’s ridiculous, if not just asinine, to assert that a good player would be less able to play accurately and adjust smoothly by ear than someone without lines.
‘But eddododo, what about beginners? A beginner fretless player is going to rely on the lines because they don’t have muscle memory buildup yet, so any flaws in the line position or intonation is going to express itself when they put their finger on that marked spot’
oh no kidding, word? Do we think that a beginner fretless player is going to sound more in tune without lines? Maybe this sounds like a strawman, but this is actually a virtually verbatim exchange I’ve had on this discussion.
The only argument, and I mean the ONLY argument that makes any sense is that an advanced player could have a better sense of intonation than the instrument markings, and that the lines will pull the player, unwillingly, towards the line and away from the proper pitch. It should be obvious, but this is an absurd argument because it assumes that an advanced enough player is going to have all of the skills, but not have developed the ability to know your instrument well enough to adjust things.. must be tough for all those wind instruments and who just have to play out of tune all the time because they can’t change natural inclination of their instruments’ keys/buttons… oh wait, nevermind, we can actually plan on certain notes and ranges responding predictably, my bad, it’s actually super easy.. my high E and A tend to be flat because of how the second valve works on my horn. I raise those pitches with my mouth when I play them. The end. Who would have guessed, the buttons don’t have to be perfect in order to play in tune at the beginning of the note.
The only difference between the two is that a beginner will sound better on a lined one quicker, and that’s about it.
Playing in tune is not something exclusive to unlined fretless, and it’s one of the goofiest arguments I’ve ever heard.
Seriously, if anyone can explain to me why an unlined fretless is exclusively capable of a resonant chord, as opposed a lined fretless, I’ll PayPal you $100.
If I can down-bend my 10th to make a resonant major chord on my FRETTED basses, why would that be uniquely difficult on a marked fretless
And for the cherry on top, my fretless is unlined, so don’t even try to bug me about that.