TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Looks good. I like the idea of the extra porting, although I suppose it only comes into play when you're putting the big juice the cab. But, it's always nice to have the option.
If I'm not mistaken, more port area allows for higher wattage without the risk of port noise or chuffing. The same tuning for that box could have been achieved with one port instead of three.
If I'm not mistaken, more port area allows for higher wattage without the risk of port noise or chuffing. The same tuning for that box could have been achieved with one port instead of three.
Correct. The air velocity in the port is directly related to power input and a bigger port area allows more power input without distortion. That only matters if the driver and the rest of the cab design is up to the task, of course.
Using different port configurations or multiple ports also create their own unique set of secondary resonances in the ports themselves. But the ramifications of that are pretty far out there in Spock territory, even for me.![]()
Interesting. My only chuffing issues came from dialing up the bass too much on a cab with poorly designed small ports. I always thought the air velocity was due to low end, not absolute volume and power at all frequencies.
"chuff-chuff"
That was me and the Berg AE410.
"chuff-chuff"
That's never, ever happened with me and the Epi UL410.
It is due to low end Ken -- but Are We Not Bassists?
Anyhow, I rarely had chuffing issues either before the current generation of bass drivers like the 3015LF became available.![]()
+1 I only experienced it in one cab that seemed to have a design issue... i.e., ports cut too small.