I've tried the Mic + DI approach and never really liked it. The two sources will be out of phase and it had an effect on the sound. I always ended up running just the mic or DI and it sounded better to me.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
+1I've tried the Mic + DI approach and never really liked it. The two sources will be out of phase and it had an effect on the sound. I always ended up running just the mic or DI and it sounded better to me.
i hate kick mics on bass because i don't go for a mid scooped sound.I use an Audix f6 for kick, anyone have any experience using this for a bass cab mic?
i.....the technique that was described and has been successful for me is do the lows with the mic and the highs and mids with the direct, then blend as to avoid cancelling of frequencies
yup. some mics, like the shure sm-58, sound great on the highs and mids but don't have anything to speak of below 100hz. so you use the di to supplement the lows and use the mic for everything else. i hate the clangy ball-less straight-di sound nowadays, so i bought a mic that reproduces lows well, but the di/mic thing is a great way to use a less expensive mic and still have low end.Personaly , I would do the exact opposite.![]()
yup. some mics, like the shure sm-58, sound great on the highs and mids but don't have anything to speak of below 100hz. so you use the di to supplement the lows and use the mic for everything else. i hate the clangy ball-less straight-di sound nowadays, so i bought a mic that reproduces lows well, but the di/mic thing is a great way to use a less expensive mic and still have low end.


, must be my amp (Ampeg SVT w/ 810 which was dead quiet BTW). I was barely through FOH so I had no apologies for playing loud that night!