TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
tombowlus said:Well, since the IP112/EX112 stack has already been posted, I'll toss out this little rig:
![]()
That is a 4 ohm VL-208, and it gets pretty darned loud for its size.![]()
tombowlus said:Well, since the IP112/EX112 stack has already been posted, I'll toss out this little rig:
![]()
That is a 4 ohm VL-208, and it gets pretty darned loud for its size.![]()
fretless Bob said:hey Tom hice rig, Gotta love that MTD
do you use the WW pre at all, i have heard people say that the pre in them isnt very good and that they just leave it flat, what your opinion on this?
Dave
tombowlus said:I think that the preamp in the WWU is very good. It's not entirely transparent or uncolored, but then again, Walter did not design it to be so. It was designed with some specific (hopefully desirable) coloration in mind, and I think that in many ways, it is very musical. It doesn't alway pair up the best with some cabs, but it definitely hits its stride with the VL-208.
That said, I do leave mine set basically "flat."
Tom.
tombowlus said:Well, since the IP112/EX112 stack has already been posted........
Pako said:You know...you could show the IP112/EX112 stack with the Millennia TD-1 preamp.![]()
fretless Bob said:thanks man,
do you think that the EQ works well with the Epifani stuff?
Dave
tombowlus said:It is okay, but to be honest, WWU/Epifani is not the best combination, IME/IMHO.
Tom.
B String said:I agree. I really wanted the the WW Ultra to work with my
Epi boxes, but the low end just wasn't there. Although
the highs were wonderfull. Just the opposite with the
IAMP 500. Amazing lows with thin and somewhat sterile highs.

jokerjkny said:woo
hoo
![]()
Hou said:![]()
![]()
Epifani cabs are the best![]()