And it is almost certainly coming as well. I think as long as Sekou is getting a few bucks from each one sold he wouldn't be too upset about Carvin suddenly seeing a big uptick in sales. As for Fender giving fire, that ship sailed decades ago.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I guess I was wrong, so then why doesn't Carvin do it?
The SB is a signature model but they already put the MM pickup in it (which really isn't the 70's jazz bass vibe at all). Not really seeing the big deal about adding a split P pickup too.
That head stock just turns me off.. (Just my opinion)...
The SB is a artist model and the B series looks a lot like a P bass already. I suspect putting a P pickup in the artist model wasn't part of the agreement. And putting a P pickup into a P shape bass (B series) might have drawn fire from Fender. But making a new body that's similar to a J and putting a P pickup in it should be litigation proof. Just speculating.
bigmoosepi[;14602315]I still can't read the name Carvin without giggling.
it just sounds so silly.
The SB is a artist model and the B series looks a lot like a P bass already. I suspect putting a P pickup in the artist model wasn't part of the agreement. And putting a P pickup into a P shape bass (B series) might have drawn fire from Fender. But making a new body that's similar to a J and putting a P pickup in it should be litigation proof. Just speculating.
I still can't read the name Carvin without giggling.
it just sounds so silly.
Cool, I learned two things with this brief message, a new word (pronounced as port-MAN-toe) and the origin of the name of Carvin.It's a portmanteau of Carson and Gavin, Lowell Kiesel's sons.