• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Fender series: MODERN PLAYER

The Jag is a lot like the basic Squier model that first appeared a year ago, married to the CV series bridge and a Geddy Lee neck, and with the J controls of the Squier Short Scele Jag. Only the lack of a rosewood fingerboard inhibits my GAS.

That Tele looks very smart, and probably has a huge sound, too.
 
Site's back up, and suddenly, I am glad that I did not rush out to get replacement pickups for my CV60's Jazz. I now have some serious GAS for this:

0241600505_frt_wlg_001.jpg
 
I don't think it is in their best interest to innovate. People want telecasters, stratocasters, precision basses, and jazz basses from them. I think Fender's following has a very low tolerance for innovation and modernization.

Why mess with perfection? Leo got it right the first time. The classic Strat, Tele, P-Bass, and Jazz Basses are all ideal instruments and fulfill the needs of millions of players just the way they are. Modern instuments have their place, but the classics are classics for a reason.
 
Why mess with perfection? Leo got it right the first time. The classic Strat, Tele, P-Bass, and Jazz Basses are all ideal instruments and fulfill the needs of millions of players just the way they are. Modern instuments have their place, but the classics are classics for a reason.

I don't think Leo thought so, considering he went on creating new instruments after leaving Fender.
 
The Tele:
If that's two "P pups" under the covers, as the ad copy indicates, color me completely uninterested.
If they're two Big Buckers, like the single unit in the Squier Tele, I see an unplanned purchase in my future.
BridgeBucker. Awesome.
 
I don't think Leo thought so, considering he went on creating new instruments after leaving Fender.
He had some good ideas and not so good ideas. The Tele and Strat were good ideas. The Jaguar and Jazzmaster, although I love both these guitars and would like to someday own one of each, weren't such good ideas. The tremolo was overly fussy, for one, and the guitars were moody. The Strat and Tele (and P- and J- bass) have been perfected over the years, but the design hasn't changed much at all. Leo was always trying to outdo himself. His later G&L guitars are argubly the best guitars ever designed. He took a near perfect design and made it even better (some wouldn't agree.) A modern Strat or Tele or P or J is probably 95% exactly the same as the original. Sure, some parts were redesigned, but the original design wasn't changed (I'm talking about redesigned bridges, tremolo blocks, little things like that.) I have a '52 reissue Tele, and it's perfect Neat V neck and vintage frets. It's been wired to have a neck - neck/bridge - bridge switch setting and it has a 6 string bridge but I'm thinking about going back to the original configuration. It wasn't be any less of a guitar when it had the original configuration, just different. Maybe better. There are lots of 3 saddle fans out there.
 
The Tele:
If that's two "P pups" under the covers, as the ad copy indicates, color me completely uninterested.
If they're two Big Buckers, like the single unit in the Squier Tele, I see an unplanned purchase in my future.
BridgeBucker. Awesome.

According to the specs at Fender.com they are called "Modern Player Wide Range humbucking Precision Bass® pickups". That doesn't mean they are your standard P-bass pickups with chrome covers, necessarily. We'll just have to wait and see.