TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's an incredibly simplistic stance to take.
In the 2016-17 playoffs: Fleury carried the team through the first two rounds. In total, Fleury played 15 games, Murray played 10.
In the 2015-16 season, Fleury single handed carried the team (58 games played, 35 Ws). Only reason he didn't play the playoffs was due to getting a concussion right before the post season.
Murray seems to be pretty alright, but it gets a little under my skin when people are so quick to give him the credit, without realizing how he got where he has -- on the coattails of Fleury.
Okay, Leaf-peepers: we’ll give you Kadri back a day early if we can get Bergeron back for tonight’s game. We’re missing him.
Murray, Fleury, Murray, Fleury. Here we go.
I find it curious that those who love Murray fail to recognize, or just choose not to mention it, the impact of having Fleury in the locker room the last two years.
It is true, Fleury did not win the games where Murray was on the ice.
It is true that having someone like Fleury in the locker room, on the ice every day for practice, as a mentor, as a friend, etc makes a huge impact.
Roll this back to 2015. Everything is identical, except Murray is the goalie and DeSmith is his backup. Do the Pens win the 2015 SC? How about 2016?
In my opinion, no. Fleury played a huge role in Murray's development and Murray did indeed ride on the coat tails of Fleury the last two years.
To Murray's credit, and I think he is an all around great guy, he has acknowledged and thanked Fleury for being a mentor.
-Mike
I thought the Leafs might actually pull a W out tonight.And my final post of the night....
Stupid Leafs.
Almost every great goalie has had a great mentor. No different than any veteran players’ impact on a young player. Do any take anything away from the young player.
It’s not like a “who’s better” thing, they won those two cups together, no different than Sawchuk and Bower winning the cup for the leafs. It’s a team win regardless.
I agree.
I just happen to think Fleury is the better goalie, and the Pens got all caught up in the hype of Murray too.
Only time will tell if I am off base with my Murray opinion.
-Mike
I thought the Leafs might actually pull a W out tonight.
As a Pens fan, I'm glad that WSH/CBJ is going to at least 6 gamesI'm hoping the Pens can put PHI away tomorrow (I won't be able to watch sadly, hosting a family event). I don't know if extra days of rest are actually beneficial (I've read rather well thought arguments both ways), but it'll hopefully pay off for them. I think Pens can beat Caps, but not sure on Jackets.
I agree.
I just happen to think Fleury is the better goalie, and the Pens got all caught up in the hype of Murray too.
Only time will tell if I am off base with my Murray opinion.
-Mike
)
) But the truth is, none of those guys nominated deserve the Norris this year. Doughty got screwed in the past so maybe the board is trying to make up for that, but c'mon!Can anybody say the words 'dead horse'? Until these two (Murray & Fleury) meet in the Finals, this whole discussion is moot. Fleury's time in the 'burgh has ended, he's flourishing in Vegas, and the Pens banked on the 22 yr old Murray to move forward with. Yeah, it would have been nice to keep 'em both but it really was a no-brainer. I don't think Gretzky leaving Edmonton sparked this much debate! LOL
Respectfully, think you have that bass-ackwards. Murray is younger, cheaper, very talented, and a better (business wise) investment. Think how Montreal kept Dryden and traded Vachon back in the day.The right move for the Pens was to trade Murray, at his peak of value, then let Fleury bring along DeSmith or Jarry just like he did Murray.
Rutherford is a big shot GM, and expansion draft trades have happened, so it would have been possible.
-Mike
DeSmith and Jarry are NOT the potential talents Murray are.Respectfully, think you have that bass-ackwards. Murray is younger, cheaper, very talented, and a better (business wise) investment. Think how Montreal kept Dryden and traded Vachon back in the day.
The right move for the Pens was to trade Murray, at his peak of value, then let Fleury bring along DeSmith or Jarry just like he did Murray.
Rutherford is a big shot GM, and expansion draft trades have happened, so it would have been possible.
-Mike
Neither Fleury or Murray are a Carey Price, and look at the albatros of a deal he cost Montreal. Not sure how they will get out from under that one. Pittsburgh made the only rational decision they could, they have a great young goalie, who has two rings....so far. Think Rutherford did the best anyone could hope for.I know we’ve had this discussion all season, and I am sticking to my opinion. Murray was the best financial option as GLG said, $3.75 million for two more years. That’s a steal. And after that he’ll only be 25 and most likely better, they’ll pay for him then.
But this season, for example, they only have $270k in cap space, who would they have had to get rid of to free up that $2mill to keep Fleury? Probably someone like Sheehan or Sheary.
If they kept Fleury, they’d either have had to trade him next year or re-sign him, he’ll be looking for a minimum 5 year contract, and he’s already 33, and trade either Desmith or Jarry. And no team wants to trade young goalie depth to keep a guy who’s looking at the back end of his career.
Unfortunately, it was a business decision, and the right one.
Right now Murray is sitting at a .948 and 1.27 GAA in the playoffs, not sure what else you could ask of him?