TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
With the Tone turned up that high it'll be cutting some of that low end back a bit.
Probably not since it's the same circuit. It looks better though, so....Yes.Random thought of the moment: does the Ictineo actually sound better than the SubD?
Mine showed up toward the end of last week, and I'm really having a good time with it. Tried it going into my TH500, but I'm actually liking the tone from the Ictineo direct into my Countryman as a different flavor from the Aguilar. Gives every note a certain heft and clarity, as others have described. Superb customer service to boot!
Zeke approves (that's about as excited as he gets).
View attachment 1103874
Please, if you can, more detail on the TH500 vs Ictineo tonal comparison.![]()
Of course! The simplest way I would explain it is that the TH500 is like a fine carpet, and the Ictineo is an exquisite hardwood flood. The Ictineo is absolutely clean, although the boost pushes the mids in a really pleasing way (in the general direction of the Phat Phuk B, without the grit). There is something going on in the low mids with the Ictineo that gives each note size and authority.
The Tone Hammer doesn't really ever get as clean as the Ictineo. It feels like there's almost always some amount of wool going on, even when it's set clean (wool probably isn't the right word, more like "harmonic complexity" that I usually associate with light OD.). There is a heft to the notes with the TH as well, but it's a different voice than the Ictineo - maybe just a bit higher in the midrange.
They are both awesome in their own way. Really it's like having a great A and B channel. I've gigged the Tone Hammer a fair amount and always enjoyed the sound I get. No gigs on the horizon since I quit my last band, but I can see how the Ictineo would be a different flavor of awesome. Hope this helps - curious if anybody has experienced the same thing.
Zeke approves (that's about as excited as he gets).
View attachment 1103874
Of course! The simplest way I would explain it is that the TH500 is like a fine carpet, and the Ictineo is an exquisite hardwood flood. The Ictineo is absolutely clean, although the boost pushes the mids in a really pleasing way (in the general direction of the Phat Phuk B, without the grit). There is something going on in the low mids with the Ictineo that gives each note size and authority.
The Tone Hammer doesn't really ever get as clean as the Ictineo. It feels like there's almost always some amount of wool going on, even when it's set clean (wool probably isn't the right word, more like "harmonic complexity" that I usually associate with light OD.). There is a heft to the notes with the TH as well, but it's a different voice than the Ictineo - maybe just a bit higher in the midrange.
They are both awesome in their own way. Really it's like having a great A and B channel. I've gigged the Tone Hammer a fair amount and always enjoyed the sound I get. No gigs on the horizon since I quit my last band, but I can see how the Ictineo would be a different flavor of awesome. Hope this helps - curious if anybody has experienced the same thing.
Huh. That is VERY interesting.
Sorry to bother you further, but now tell me more about Ictineo vs Phat Phuk B, because the latter is one of my favourite tonal magic pedals of all time, and I ache daily from massive regret that I sent my Phatty off to @dinoadventures...at least he loves it as much as I do/did, so I guess there is some solace to be had there. Anyway, yeah, you've piqued my curiosity by making this comparison, so please carry on.![]()
I don't see what the PPB has to do with the Ictineo at all, sorry. They can both function as a boost, I guess. Maybe if you configure the Ictineo to be as warm as possible, which might sound fine, but I wouldn't say the Ictineo could very well substitute for the PPB.
The Ictineo and the PPB are as different as they are similar. The PPB has that musical grind/grit that always comes through. It's one of my favorite sounds with the TH - and is usually on if I'm playing. The only time I turn the PPB off is when I'm playing with the ictineo. Both the Ictineo and PPB push the sound in a musical way. The mid content is slightly different, and the PPB is clearly more gritty and grinds, but they both give your tone an extra sparkle and boost. At least to my ears.
The main basis for my comparison is that I don't like the PPB into the Ictineo nearly as much. In my mind it's because they fulfill a similar role - that little extra magic and clarity. The PPB into the TH is like a slightly darker, woolier variation of the Ictineo. Hope this helps.
If I can get my recording interface back up and running, I'll try to record some clips, if only because I'm curious if my impressions hold up under that microscope.