• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Offical B.C. Rich Club!

Just saw my purple Mock shared over on Facebook, here's one I just got back yesterday, 1984 USA Wave that was repainted in rare blue burst by the BCR Custom Shop (yes they're still around and will build you anything your heart desires)
20251210_100210.jpg
 
I've been thinking about this. How do the progressive cap values affect the tone? It seems pretty popular with these to have the Varitone set where I do, off.
I can't remember the values but think of a Rickenbacker 4001 with the .47 cap, they basically filters that change the tone, usable? Debatable, keep in mind its 70s technology and was just a way of adding something different into the mix. I've seen so many BCRs that were gutted out in favor of EMGs, sad really, the DiMarzios sound great passively, don't know why folks didn't just unsolder the varitone or the booster if they disliked it so much
 
  • Like
Reactions: BklynKen
Has anyone replaced the saddles on an original Badass bridge? I'd like to narrow the string spacing on my Bodine and if these will fit the original Badass, this should be a clean way to do it.

Haven't tried it but I've looked at replacing Badass saddles with saddles from the repo Badass , they just don't sit in the channels right , so my guess is going to be a no
 
Haven't tried it but I've looked at replacing Badass saddles with saddles from the repo Badass , they just don't sit in the channels right , so my guess is going to be a no
Thanks. I realized that the saddles I linked to must be for the Badass II. I might get Allparts' Badass I and slot it how I want. I don't mind so much since it wouldn't require modification. Same reason I went with the Schaller M4S lightweight tuners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9c1ny
Thanks. I realized that the saddles I linked to must be for the Badass II. I might get Allparts' Badass I and slot it how I want. I don't mind so much since it wouldn't require modification. Same reason I went with the Schaller M4S lightweight tuners.
Those new badasses are nice, only real difference cosmetically is the script is a little smaller, grabbed a few on eBay over the summer, dude was selling them for like $30 shipped
 
View attachment 7393254I have this beautiful US warlock that i love everything about except the pickups. is it sacrelidge to replace the dimarzios with bartolinis (which i use on everything else i have)? have to rewire the bass anyway as the bridge volume pot doesnt work properly. thinking of putting a black badass 1 on also. thoughts??
Gotta enjoy it too, swap the pickups. Might not have the right neck angle for a BA1
 
thinking of putting a black badass 1 on

Might not have the right neck angle for a BA1
Here's a friendly PSA about bridge swapping.
The Badass 2 is a Fender direct replacement.

Fenders are flat, no break. The neck/fingerboard is high above the body where they meet.

To have a fingerboard close to the body, BC RICH construction employs a shim under the fingerboard from about the 16th fret to the end of the board.
& the body falls away from the neck at an angle appropriate for the bridge being used.
For those mathematically inclined... rise over run formula:
Screenshot_20251221_192114_Chrome.jpg

So, the basic break angle for all the Fender replacement bridges is just under 1°
(.89°-ish)
The Badass 1 is taller... by a bunch.
It needs about a 1.75° break
Don't quote me on the exact Trigonometry (trimotromony?)... 🤷 We have a jig thing Neal made calculate break for different bridge elevations.
...
But yeah no...
You can not use a BA 1 where a BA 2 (etc.) currently exists.
...
See attached visual aids...
...for your pleasure:
Screenshot_20251221_082234_Google.jpg
Screenshot_20251221_083449_Google.jpg
Screenshot_20251221_083718_Google.jpg
Screenshot_20251221_084537_Google.jpg
Screenshot_20251221_083903_Google.jpg

Visual:
Screenshot_20251221_090324_Google.jpg
Screenshot_20251221_090202_Google.jpg

This is with the grub screws barely engaged. Or... "minimal string height":
20251221_104320.jpg

✌️🤓
 
Last edited:
Here's a friendly PSA about bridge swapping.
The Badass 2 is a Fender direct replacement.

Fenders are flat, no break. The neck/fingerboard is high above the body where they meet.

To have a fingerboard close to the body, BC RICH construction employs a shim under the fingerboard from about the 16th fret to the end of the board.
& the body falls away from the neck at an angle appropriate for the bridge being used.
For those mathematically inclined... rise over run formula:View attachment 7393874
So, the basic break angle for all the Fender replacement bridges is just under 1°
(.89°-ish)
The Badass 1 is taller... by a bunch.
It needs about a 1.75° break
Don't quote me on the exact Trigonometry (trimotromony?)... 🤷 We have a jig thing Neal made calculate break for different bridge elevations.
...
But yeah no...
You can not use a BA 1 where a BA 2 (etc.) currently exists.
...
See attached visual aids...
...for your pleasure:
View attachment 7393875View attachment 7393876View attachment 7393877View attachment 7393878View attachment 7393879
Visual: View attachment 7393880View attachment 7393881
This is with the grub screws barely engaged. Or... "minimal string height":View attachment 7393882
✌️🤓
And there you have it folks.