Sounds like the guys installing nuts / polying fretboards / applying finishes / building the necks were stoned on the job between Feb and March in 2010. The 2011's have been, I think, unanimously awesome.
Sure seems that way.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sounds like the guys installing nuts / polying fretboards / applying finishes / building the necks were stoned on the job between Feb and March in 2010. The 2011's have been, I think, unanimously awesome.
Seeing the lines doesn't bother me, but being able to clearly feel them does. It makes me think that the pieces weren't glued together precisely or tightly enough and there was some separation before it was painted. Looking at it again, it's the joint down the middle between the two piece neck that stands out the most. I really hate to go through the hassle and gamble of exchanging this, but I'm worried about future problems plus the effect it would have on resale value if I ever decide to sell the bass in the future. As I mentioned in another post, the only other flaws are some tail lift and some excess glue on a short portion of the fingerboard. Anyone think I should exchange it?
Being delivered tomorrow. Didn't ship till Sunday night. Maybe I'll get the 2011? Crossing fingers it doesn't have issues that cannot be fixed.

Sounds like the guys installing nuts / polying fretboards / applying finishes / building the necks were stoned on the job between Feb and March in 2010. The 2011's have been, I think, unanimously awesome.
Nope, mine's a March of 2011 model - seemingly one of the newest ones folks got. Re-posting another pic of the finish blem around the bridge.
Hmm, thats unfortunate. Did it set up well? Did you have any issue with the neck or the nut?
Didn't even try, I'm not keeping it with a defect like that.
Excuse my ignorance, but where is the blemish? I can't see it in the picture... I'm sure its right in front of my face.
Not being sarcastic btw. Do you mean that small gap between the body and bridge at the corner? Or the odd reflective pattern on the side of the bridge?
Or the odd reflective pattern on the side of the bridge?
Excuse my ignorance, but where is the blemish? I can't see it in the picture... I'm sure its right in front of my face.
Not being sarcastic btw. Do you mean that small gap between the body and bridge at the corner? Or the odd reflective pattern on the side of the bridge?
Not many blue basses in the spotlight being played. I am RIC owner, first a FG not the brownish version available now but the more yellow/red-ish colour of past. The bass played fine but the colour bothered me, looked like I was playing on a Royal Caribbean cruise ship. I sold it and got a JG, now that's rock n'roll.
I know the price is right argument its a good one but at the end of the day, which in this case will be about 3 months for those Midnite blue RICs to start hitting the resale bins, that will be just before someone starts talking about refinishing the blue RIC to a more standard colour.
Midnight Blue is nice to hang on your wall or store in your closet or for a good lounge/wedding band. The only blue bass in rock n'roll is Lake Placid blue. Just an opinion but check to see how many major players are rocking blue basses, the colour is best suited for guitars than bass. Remember there is always a reason for the blowout sale. ConGrats all you new RIC owners and welcome.
Looks like the bridge was drilled too far into the bass, and the paint started to chip on the sides of it
Looks like the bridge was drilled too far into the bass, and the paint started to chip on the sides of it
This post makes zero sense, it amazes me some thinks this way.