I'll be able to test this out myself with the same strings when the Vinny arrives since I have a 34" sonus custom as well. Personally i expect the Vinny to have stiffer feeling strings, but who knows.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I used to think the Sonus Special 5 I had a while back was the best fretless I'd ever played... then I played a "sorta" TJ5 fretless we got in for review. Oh my gosh, it was even better. I say "sorta" because the body shape was the same, but there were a lot of other diffs between it and a real TJ5 made to Todd's spec.
Phenomenal instrument, and if fretless was my main instrument (it is not by a long shot these days), that bass never woulda' left my hands after the mag was done with it. Never.
Also, the one we tested I think had different pickups, preamp, and no ramp, but I'd have to go back to the site and review to double check. Anyway, not a true TJ per the video, but it didn't really matter to me.Yes...mine is a "sorta" also....mahogany with maple top instead of alder with maple...of course fretless, 5-string and 29 positions on the fingerboard...and the fingerboard doesn't go all the way to the neck pick-up which is also moved a bit towards the bridge.
You know, the physics pretty much requires that the tension will equivalent for the same fundamental at the same scale length.Yes...in theory this works, but remeber your dealing with a headless instrument with less overall string length from one end to the other...this small difference makes a huge difference if string tension is critical to you style of play. I noticed if your a slapper it actually makes it easier to play, and its fun, but if your into quick fingerstyle jaco like runs this design might not work for you. I'm not saying its bad, just be aware of the performance/response of a design like this.
Agreed, and this is what I'd expect as well, which I would think would yield a stiffer feel on the headless design, but maybe something else is going on. I look forward to the A/B test ehque says he can do when he gets his VB.You know, the physics pretty much requires that the tension will equivalent for the same fundamental at the same scale length.
That said, the lossiness of the fulcrums has a big effect on your perception of "tightness." So, it isn't just the headless vs non-headless at issue. Any two instruments that have different hold down technology at either the bridge or nut will have different feels. Its not tension, but fulcrum point loss characteristics you are describing. Different things, but ultimately to the player either can be decisive. IMO.
I'll just add that my Sonus Special 5, which is Gard's old bass and first cousin to the axe Kesslari has up for sale, is just killin' through my Shuttle 9 / AE212. Joe may make better fretless instruments; but, that's the fretless rig I'm goin' to the grave with.
A question about Zon's repair time.
My bass is actually @ Zon's HQ (I would be really pleased if someone there would take few minutes to answer my mail).
Considering I want a truss rod installed and minor setup, do you have any idea how long it may take them ?
Thanks
Angus said:HyperbasS. He has a new vb4?
HyperbasS. He has a new vb4?
fretless4string said:Does anyone know what Michael calls the buckeye VB4? He usually has names for all his instruments.
I am leaning towards black, and I am also leaning towards the newer satin finish. I love the way it works on other basses that have that type of finish, and done right, you don't really lose any figure vibrancy or depth, either.That is a lovely hunk o' wood there, Vic. Gonna be a nice bass!
I prefer black HW, but that's just me. I love the way my new Zon looks with the black - and with a "straight" black headstock, the black tuners look pretty wonderfully "stealth".
You going high-gloss or low-gloss finish?