• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

People who are banned

IMG_1772.PNG
IMG_1774.PNG
IMG_1772.PNG
F
I'd like to suggest having a section here that lists the people who are banned, and why. Not in thread form where people can comment, as that would go downhill real quickly - but a listing and explanation. To me that only seems right.

Many of us here form friendships/relationship with other members, and then if or when they're suddenly cut, it's over. And we have to then walk on eggshells trying to find out why.

I have some other ideas about this feature, and more ideas on why I think it would benefit the forum in many ways, but I'm tapping this out on my phone (which I hate doing), and just want to get the ball rolling.

What does everyone else think? Pros? Cons? Suggestions on making it work well?






Didn't get a reply when I sent this to you.

Guessing the Moderators are watching this site.

Could you possibly remove this guy please?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacBass65
But the rules specifically cover this issue. If someone doesn't read the rules, then why would a post of bans help??
TB's rules are available via link from EVERY PAGE ON THE SITE. If that's not easy enough of a reminder for you, you expect us to believe a list of banned members and the reasons why posted in ONE place is going to be enough?
Doubt it.
i think you are both making excellent points! :thumbsup:

i think joe's point is even better. sorry if i sidetracked.
 
Unrelated to your topic, sorta. looks like a spam account had been created, @Ross W. Lovell reported it, didn't see a response, knew mods were watching this thread, so posted it here.

Kinda funny really.

And for future reference for anyone, if you see a post that needs reporting, click the post report button and it goes to a report section that all moderators can see, and all moderators can ban spam accounts regardless of which forums they moderate. If you send a report to the help desk, only the administrators see it- there's only a couple of us, and I had a very long band practice last night.
 
And for future reference for anyone, if you see a post that needs reporting, click the post report button and it goes to a report section that all moderators can see, and all moderators can ban spam accounts regardless of which forums they moderate. If you send a report to the help desk, only the administrators see it- there's only a couple of us, and I had a very long band practice last night.
 
I agree with the above. As someone who trips/falls/steps over lines in real life on occasion, I wouldn't mind seeing real-world examples of where the lines are. Not that I post all that much anymore.


Ok ... full disclosure, the gossipy part of me just wants to know as well. Still wondering about Jacquo III-X and Jeff Berlin, just as a student of Talkbass History.

I would question the sensibility of a site that would ban someone of the talent and import of Jeff Berlin; that is, if I were to question things. I'm not questioning it but I do wonder what we have missed out on learning.

I met Jacquo in real life last year at a guitar store in Chicago, not knowing who he was or that he was even on TB at one time. He was cool. Weird and cool. And I later bought his $15 groove download and it's really good and I confirmed with a world-class blues guitarist friend who grew up with Jacquo that he IS a bass badmofo. I'm sure the "other" Jaco would be banned, too- for a disability sometimes beyond his control- I suspect that Jacquo may suffer from a disability of a similar nature.
 
I would question the sensibility of a site that would ban someone of the talent and import of Jeff Berlin; that is, if I were to question things. I'm not questioning it but I do wonder what we have missed out on learning.

I met Jacquo in real life last year at a guitar store in Chicago, not knowing who he was or that he was even on TB at one time. He was cool. Weird and cool. And I later bought his $15 groove download and it's really good and I confirmed with a world-class blues guitarist friend who grew up with Jacquo that he IS a bass badmofo. I'm sure the "other" Jaco would be banned, too- for a disability sometimes beyond his control- I suspect that Jacquo may suffer from a disability of a similar nature.

If you know of Jeff Berlin, then you know that his personality has often outrun his talent, and it has cost him. If you know THAT, then it's of no surprise that he's no longer welcome on TB.

And if that doesn't make enough sense, you can do a 5 second google search and find this:

why was jeff berlin banned?
 
Last edited:
Wow is right.
I knew Jeff Berlin was banned and had a fair idea why, but having read through that link, I am absolutely amazed at how lenient the mods were in dealing with him.
I actually tried to count how many violations he got away with, and lost track completely.
A guy who brags about not having read the rules, who clearly felt they shouldn't apply to him ... TB is clearly better off without him.
I was also surprised at how many people seemed to support him, either because of his playing ability or because they just don't like rules themselves.
 
In response to this latest tangent, the best i can say is that mods and admins do tend to discuss almost all reports before warnings are given out unless they are unbelievably flagrant - i.e. "shag you, mothershagger" and the like. As to the wording, mods try to adhere to the spirit of the rules. Some members like to push boundaries by adhering only to the letter of the rules and then crying foul when they get warned for violating the spirit of them.

This is where the moderator discretion applies, and I din't think that will be changing any time soon. Language will always leave loopholes no matter how explicit the language gets - see our country's tax code for an example. In the public sector, people pay legal experts to find ways around the rules that can't be prosecuted under the current language, and feel very clever when they find one they can exploit even while they know that the loophole in question is completely against the spirit of the law. Fortunately for us, we are a private site and can try to make the spirit of the law reasonably clear without making the letter of it the size of a Michener novel. Beyond that, moderator discretion applies.
"without making the letter of it the size of a Michener novel."-And that reference takes the 2017 Gold Cup for Sheer, Obscure Wit.