• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rosewood vs maple or vice versa and why

Black and maple.
14EFFED6-4798-4659-A4FB-9648FABDC8A2.jpeg
 
Tough call. I like the vintage maple (yellow slightly) on a 50s P I have and the Geddy Jazz with black blocks or like on the US Ged.

I guess if pressed I'd go rosewood. Great on P basses, Jazz, Rick. Etc. Long as it's a dark grain.
 
I remember the first time I saw this topic on TB, and I naively said something like "if you've got a perfectly good stick of maple, why glue another piece of wood on top" and hooooo boy.

Anyway, I like em both ways for fretted instruments, no preference one way or the other. For fretless, I've never tried maple, and don't know why I would.
 
i am used to rosewood but a next bass will have a one piece body (no glued on fingerboard), most likely from maple.

I am not all too interested in what a bass looks likeit but like the idea of getting a bass made from just two pieces of wood, hoping for tonal benefits( as minor as they may be) too..:)
 
Last edited:
Maple fretboard, because lacquered neck is more stabile during weather/humidity changes. Sound difference is small and both look fine to me. But I prefer more stabile neck.
I don't think a thin layer of finish on the fretboard makes a difference and for what's it's worth my one-piece maple necks are the least stable in my stable. A glued-on fretboard should make the neck move less, right?