• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SHOW YOUR DISTRESSED FINISHES!

Whew! I discovered this thread about a month ago, and it's taken that long to digest it! I even slowed down over the last week because I didn't want the joys to end. Thanks to @JIO for keeping things civil and to stalwart contributors like @God's Favorite Bass and so many others. This thread must be the greatest compendium of bass porn in the world.

Here's all I can offer personally: A 2005 '62 AVRI that's been my #1 over that time. It's had a Jazz neck and the same La Bella flats since 2006. I've never cleaned the body.

Link Removed View attachment 4684247 View attachment 4684240 View attachment 4684241
That's a beauty right there. The macro pics are the icing on the cake. It's checking all the boxes with me man.:thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: cymbop
:) Thanks for your kind words @cymbop - we're over 5k posts strong! :thumbsup: Your fine addition is welcomed, especially as it is your #1 player. Many if not all of the '50s/'60s vintage road warriors seen here were someones #1 player. That was not only because of less choices out there (and a general consensus that Fender basses ruled), but also the thinner nitro finishes. But regardless of vintage or brand, a played bass gets dings in the hs from hitting cymbals, dings/chips in on the edges of the body from any number of occurrences, and player interface from fingernails, picks, a bracelet, rings, or if played in a rough roadhouse, a beer bottle! :D From "mild relic" to "very distressed" - it's a sign that the bass is played - not idolized! :bassist:
 
So, I want to run an idea by the brain trust here. ;)

Personally I love play-wear on a bass, and personally I prefer real wear to an artist's relic work. I'm 46 and I've got my Destination P-bass on order, a Lakland 44-64. I won't buy another bass for a decade or more. I asked for a custom finish, and they said "we've never ever done that, but sure why not."

It's Sonic Blue (no more coats than necessary) over Candy Apple Red, with no clear coat. I want the chance to play the ever-loving heck out of it and see some real wear before I'm too old to rock out.

Will this work, friends? It's a poly paint, not nitro. I love the thought of playing it 'til I can see it "bleed."
 
So, I want to run an idea by the brain trust here. ;)

Personally I love play-wear on a bass, and personally I prefer real wear to an artist's relic work. I'm 46 and I've got my Destination P-bass on order, a Lakland 44-64. I won't buy another bass for a decade or more. I asked for a custom finish, and they said "we've never ever done that, but sure why not."

It's Sonic Blue (no more coats than necessary) over Candy Apple Red, with no clear coat. I want the chance to play the ever-loving heck out of it and see some real wear before I'm too old to rock out.

Will this work, friends? It's a poly paint, not nitro. I love the thought of playing it 'til I can see it "bleed."

It will need to be the lightest of covering coat(s) of the Sonic blue. Poly finishes can 'wear' from interface/use, but it's generally tougher than nitro. Also, nitro shrinks over time - so becomes even more susceptible to wear. Many times I'll do a base coat of poly or enamel, and shoot nitro clear (satin) over it. This allows wear and also will amber over time, so a Sonic blue will take on a greenish tint. Generally poly finishes stay the colour they start out as.
 
Yeah! I don't actually love the "greening" that happens to Sonic or Lake Placid when the clear coat ambers over time, I just want every ding and scratch (and hopefully, in time, the armrest area) to reveal the CAR beneath.
It would be safe to say your expectation is a reasonable one. If you are playing it a lot and taking it out, or even at home if you are clumsy :D you'll get there. Sadly as much as I love these I don't really own any qualifiers. Best I can do. It's a trusty old Jazz bass with some discoloration.
16520364392214643391039603982866.jpg
16520365292011065340153651214636.jpg
16520365582333221177879652215484.jpg
Funny thing is before it was a "thing" I had a booth at my old house and would from time to time take in work from Dave's Guitars in LaX, WI. Vintage hadn't blown up just yet so I would often take payment in the form of some bass I had been eying. Usually some great "players" bass with wear or a bad refin and immediately go about refinishing it. Oh to have a few of those back prior to me and my big ideas.:rollno:
 
  • Like
Reactions: JIO and cymbop
I love this thread.

I need to get some good pics of my '82 Tookay.
It has a newer neck, but the body has some wear.
A couple spots where the finish is missing, but was "touched up"

Also interesting, the replacement neck was originally full gloss, but someone knocked it down to satin on the front and back, but left the headstock alone.
Sounds like it was for functional purpose. I'm a take it or leave it on satin necks but weird in that I gotta have a glossy peg head face, the rest doesn't matter. I guess of the ones I have that are satin I prefer peg head face/board gloss and satin backs. Don't know why.

Quit holding out on the Gee and El.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dedpool1052
Sounds like it was for functional purpose. I'm a take it or leave it on satin necks but weird in that I gotta have a glossy peg head face, the rest doesn't matter. I guess of the ones I have that are satin I prefer peg head face/board gloss and satin backs. Don't know why.

Quit holding out on the Gee and El.
If it's a maple fretboard, it's full gloss or satin for me.
I had a strat a number of years back, that was gloss on the face, satin on the back.
The feel was odd for me.

If a bass has a dark fretboard, I don't mind a gloss headstock, and satin back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: God's Favorite Bass
Found this guitar in an antique mall the other day.
20220515_140142.jpg

This is just how I found it. Misplaced bridge, very old strings, a couple minor cracks and one very peculiar aspect I don't believe I've ever seen on a guitar of this age (1930's) so seemingly un touched by any luthiers in the past.
20220515_140250.jpg

The action with moderate hight at the bridge was sitting right around 4/64 really weird! I changed the strings and it plays almost perfect! Anyway old distressed stuff for y'all..
20220515_140200.jpg

20220515_140154.jpg
20220515_140222.jpg

Here's an end of one of the strings I pulled any idea how old/what these were?
20220515_141131.jpg
 
Found this guitar in an antique mall the other day.
View attachment 4696827
This is just how I found it. Misplaced bridge, very old strings, a couple minor cracks and one very peculiar aspect I don't believe I've ever seen on a guitar of this age (1930's) so seemingly un touched by any luthiers in the past.
View attachment 4696830
The action with moderate hight at the bridge was sitting right around 4/64 really weird! I changed the strings and it plays almost perfect! Anyway old distressed stuff for y'all..View attachment 4696831
View attachment 4696833View attachment 4696834
Here's an end of one of the strings I pulled any idea how old/what these were?
View attachment 4696836
So did you name the May Bell Mabel?!? It's cool and the industrial string is as well, plus bonus points for the little jet.
 
one very peculiar aspect I don't believe I've ever seen on a guitar of this age (1930's) so seemingly un touched by any luthiers in the past.
View attachment 4696831

That hs slot/nut routing is crazy... how could someone think that was a good solution? o_O