• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Sid Vicious could play the bass

Never mind the bollocks sold 1.3 million copies. U2 has sold a billion records. Karen Carpenter made platinum albums. 2 bass players, and a drummer with really rudimentary skills who were successful. Sid sold more albums than Victor Wooten. Adam Clayton sold more records than all the top 'good' bass players combined. Karen Carpenter sold more records than Billy Cobham. Clearly, good enough was good enough.
Karen's skills on drums were a lot better than "rudimentary." She just didn't get a chance to show it on their music because it was singer music, not drum music.
 
Not really clear on your dates. X’s first album was released in 1980, Black Flag’s in 1981, and the Minutemen’s first EP was released in 1981 and LP in 1983.

By that time I was traveling internationally with what was a Southern Rock band that quickly morphed into a Western Swing/Country Rock band to capitalize on the Urban Cowboy phenom. I already told you I was a total musical whore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacBass65
Not really clear on your dates. X’s first album was released in 1980, Black Flag’s in 1981, and the Minutemen’s first EP was released in 1981 and LP in 1983.

I'm gonna split the difference between you and @Humbled and call the "center mass" of the punk movement as 1977.
This was the year the Ramones released second album "Leave Home," (January 19, 1977). I was already aware of the band, but as a suburban L.A. kid I took note of the fact that my local Licorice Pizza Records devoted a whole middle display rack to the album. This was a bold move, like moving the Corn Flakes down a shelf to highlight Bran Flakes. Both the US labels and (more importantly) the retailers were betting on punk. January 1977.

The record companies got a pitiful fistful back, of course, as the general consumer rejected punk as a gambit. But the major labels recouped handsomely when punk became "New Wave" early 80s, Boy George/George Michael/Frankie Says Relax/Madonna/Duran Duran.... For a good long spell it rained greenbacks on places such as Burbank, California, once the home of mighty Warner Brothers Records, who released "Never Mind The Bollocks" and also the second PiL album before falling out with Lydon when he characterized them in the press as straight up legit mobsters.
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna split the difference between you and @Humbled and call the "center mass" of the punk movement as 1977.
This was the year the Ramones released second album "Leave Home," (January 19, 1977). I was already aware of the band, but as a suburban L.A. kid I took note of the fact that my local Licorice Pizza Records L.A. devoted a whole middle display rack to the album. This was a bold move, like moving the Corn Flakes down a shelf to highlight Bran Flakes. Both the US labels and (more importantly) the retailers were betting on punk. January 1977.

The record companies got a pitiful fistful back, of course, as the general consumer rejected punk as a gambit. But the major labels recouped handsomely when punk became "New Wave" early 80s, Boy George/George Michael/Frankie Says Relax/Madonna/Duran Duran.... For a good long spell it rained greenbacks on places such as Burbank, California, once the home of mighty Warner Brothers Records, who released "Never Mind The Bollocks" and also released the second PiL album before falling out with Lydon when he characterized them in the press as straight up legit mobsters.

Punk is like the VU: limited sales at the time and hugely influential over the decades. Every time I hear David Bowie's "Heros", I hear Lou Reed all over it.
 
I don't think it started there, but it didn't end in 1980 either. Humbled was limiting the time frame of American Punk to 1975-1980.
That is true. It's still going on. As long as there are pissed off kids, it'll continue. Some of them have dubious reasons for being pissed off, but whatever :D
 
English punk was quite different from the US import version, IIRC.

I think it fairly rapidly became different, but I think that there was more art-school influence early on.

Back in 1980 when I was starting secondary school you had the option of being a punk or liking ska, but some of the punk options people might now consider the first flush of New Romantics which seemed to be punk going back to art school to some extent, but from the other direction. But then you had punk bands dabbling in reggae and vice-versa so it's all a bit absurd as it was pretty fluid over a short period of time.
 
I find interesting that so many comments here are about Sid's lack of musicianship...

No one, including the OP said anything about him as a, or being a musician..

OP simply stated the yes, at one point, obviously before he became a raging junkie... that he actually played.. very little mind you, because like all of us at one point, he was just learning when he was pulled into the band... and was only so because he looked more the part over Glenn Matlock

...and then yours truly posted a link to a good quality demo recorded at the Sex Pistols rehearsal space, with Sid on bass playing a song he wrote! So there's that one little bit of musicianship ;)
 
I find that The Clash had limited success with ska, but were pretty good at incorporating all sorts of influences into their music. Their best efforts are always a blend of something and them, as opposed to being true to a style. Plus Complete Control might be the greatest punk song/song ever. The Sex Pistols might have been a force of nature influencing later generations, but The Clash were musically gifted in a way that went well beyond anything the Pistols ever did.

I get the impression that the people in The Sex Pistols had little interest in it as anything long term, which might explain some of it. I look at it as an art project in and of itself like an installation. And there's nothing particularly wrong with that, but it's quite an art school view of things. There are many other bands that came up before then that were much more concerned about a form of career.

But then the boundaries of punk are really ill-defined. The Jam, as another example, seemed to toy with some of the guitar sounds of punk, but also the R&B background of mod along with the suits, but then The Beat were also wearing the suits and incorporating Motown and crossing over into punk from a different melting pot.

It seems like a pretty exciting period of music, more so than today, but then I also have no idea what 'the kids' listen to now. I do know it's not really music and you can't understand the lyrics. Now I have to ask you to get off my lawn.
 
I get the impression that the people in The Sex Pistols had little interest in it as anything long term, which might explain some of it. I look at it as an art project in and of itself like an installation. And there's nothing particularly wrong with that, but it's quite an art school view of things. There are many other bands that came up before then that were much more concerned about a form of career.
Steve Jones and Paul Cook would have probably liked it to go longer, as they tried to make it happen again after Johnny and Sid left. In a very weird way by getting Great Train Robbery exile Ronald Biggs to sing a song, yes, but hey...

But Johnny clearly had plans to use it as a stepping stone.