• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Smoking pot while being in a band

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, he's right. Pot isn't going to do anything to improve your life. It's a drug that removes you from reality, and in every case I've seen it reduces musicians' capacity to perform at their highest level. Sure, it makes you feel groovy, and I don't have any problem with people who smoke pot in general. Just don't do it during practice or gigs with my band.

He's not right, and pot does plenty to improve some people's lives. Does it improve mine, not quite, especially not in the way it might a cancer patients, but it certainly doesnt detract from it. Removes one from reality? Uh, no, not in the least. Your every witness of its effects is definitely not the same as mine, as Ive seen many times it have no effect on a musicians capacity to perform. Of course not everyone reacts the same, and I wont say that Ive never seen people who can't play when theyre stoned. I just dont favor such sweeping generalizations.
 
Well then I will point you to this link, which coincidentally enough is the first result when you Google search does marijuana cause brain damage: Heavy Marijuana Use Doesn't Damage Brain

You're not the only one who can do a Google search. Marijuana, weed brain scan | ENCOGNITIVE.COM

Ta da!

For the record, I don't really care if someone else smokes pot (so long as they don't do it near me, as I can't stand the smell), and I don't know whether to believe it actually has health risks, given the contrasting evidence out there. I just don't like the holier-than-thou attitude of pot users, and there's plenty of it in this thread.
 
The Beatles themselves said they were experimenting with marijuana in late '64, around the time they were getting into Dylan. Watch the Anthology DVD's

I know, that's what I was saying...I'm pretty sure they were already into way heavier stuff by the time Peppers came out...

Heck, John Lennon (in the Yoko years) used to do smack with Kieth Richards at his place, and Richards would hate on him because he "couldn't handle his stuff". He said he'd curl up in a ball puking all night. It'd be a real buzz kill. It's all in Richards' book.
 
You're not the only one who can do a Google search. Marijuana, weed brain scan | ENCOGNITIVE.COM

Ta da!

For the record, I don't really care if someone else smokes pot (so long as they don't do it near me, as I can't stand the smell), and I don't know whether to believe it actually has health risks, given the contrasting evidence out there. I just don't like the holier-than-thou attitude of pot users, and there's plenty of it in this thread.

A term paper written by an undergrad for a Biology 202 class at a university that has less than 1300 undergraduate students is your rebuttal to my WebMD article? I'm not even sure what to say to that. :)
 
This thread really should be closed IMHO.

If you are a musician, and you dispute the fact that a huge percentage of great music was written under the influence, especially in rock and its subgenres, you are pretty ignorant and need to refresh your music history. And its not just the Beatles or the Stones either. And its not just music either. In poetry, painting, writting, everywhere, there are tons of work that was done under the influence, and I dare say, more of the "Great" ones were stoned or high, or drunk than the ones that were sober. Deal with it.

If you dont smoke, well, then keep on not smoking. But keep the crusader armour in your garage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts