• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SpaceX and other space stuff

Well... that was, uh... something? :wacky: Exactly what kind of something, nobody seems to know yet. :roflmao:

In the chatter of the nearby-condo guys, they are using words like "thump" and "shrapnel" and debris."



Why anyone would go ahead with a test in thick fog is beyond me, regardless. Ground cameras have a purpose. o_O

ETA: Now they're saying their camera definitely took a hit. They're working on re-racking the footage. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
Well... that was, uh... something? :wacky: Exactly what kind of something, nobody seems to know yet. :roflmao:

In the chatter of the nearby-condo guys, they are using words like "thump" and "shrapnel" and debris."



Why anyone would go ahead with a test in thick fog is beyond me, regardless. Ground cameras have a purpose. o_O

ETA: Now they're saying their camera definitely took a hit. They're working on re-racking the footage. :laugh:

Wow!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
I, for one, salute that brave yucca plant in the middle for its heroic sacrifice. :dead: :confused:

salute-richard pryor (anim).gif


Not to worry. We've got a small clutch of yuccas in our yard, and they are [bleep] near indestructible. :roflmao:
 
This Starship stuff is not going well.
I disagree - it's going very well, despite appearances. What they're attempting is amazingly difficult, it's not really reasonable to expect everything to go smoothly. Not at all unexpected for the phase they're in.
 
I disagree - it's going very well, despite appearances. What they're attempting is amazingly difficult, it's not really reasonable to expect everything to go smoothly. Not at all unexpected for the phase they're in.
While this is certainly true from the standpoint of science and engineering, @JKos is also correct that in terms of public image, fostering the expectation that your rocket ships crash in spectacular fireballs might not be the best form of advertising. Two sides of a coin... ;)


...a big, shiny, explodey coin. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: StereoPlayer
The same sort of things happened at the beginning of the Space Age. There were numerous failures just trying to launch and orbit the first satellites. Let alone a human capable system that lands and can be reused. Space is not the place for instant gratification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
Yeah, what SpaceX is doing now is equivalent in terms of risk to the early days of the space program. New engine technologies, new flight profiles, etc.
I started work at a rocket test facility in 1983. My first boss handed me a thick binder of procedures, "This is a book of mistakes" he said. It was policies and procedures how to test rockets. The binders for how to design and manufacture rockets were incredibly thick.

Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, etc. learned these lessons back in the 60's and 70's. Incorporating all those lessons learned is expensive, and the rockets built by the major players today are very expensive. SpaceX is learning as they go. They are very price competitive now, but as they incorporate lessons learned, their costs will rise also.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow

Latest posts