• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stingray Classic Returns

I don’t know if any of you have tried to take a square on photo of several basses but owing to the perspective change the ones off centre, even though the dimensions can be identical, can look different sizes - same with people.

It’s especially true of apparent inconsistencies in string alignment on basses - I would suggest a misaligned bridge is nigh on impossible for a bass where the body is produced on a CNC machine with super fine tolerances and assembled with the level of skill and QC employed by EBMM. As an example note the difference in size (apparent) of these basses (most of which are identical in dimensions).

View attachment 5238020
What a collection. But that fretless… WOW!
 
In pics it looks Tiffany Blue to me.

It’s definitely as almost seafoam as the classic is almost fiesta (but not quite - see attached comparison with 60 P). Here it is with its pastel shade sibling!!

IMG_0011.jpeg

IMG_2091.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I'm a huge Music Man fan boy, but the price on these is frankly eye-watering. I'm not sure how I feel about paying this much for features that are objectively worse than modern Stingrays. The long pole pickup can allegedly cause warbling that even Leo Fender, who was deaf as a post by this point, could hear. (Never played one so please correct me if I'm wrong).

What I kind of want to do instead is pick up one of the ubiquitous used Stingray Specials and swap in an East 4 knob and a retro alnico like a Novak. It would probably sound identical, be a superior instrument by many metrics, and would cost about $1000 less when you factor in not having to pay sales tax on a new $3300 bass.
 
These things are priced below the cost of a Fender CS bass and many other top makers. Does anybody ask Roger Sadowsky how much he pays his employees making $7000.00 Jazz bases? I've always heard EBMM quality is second to none. Why is the price for this throwback such an issue?

You make a good point. I am one of those hesitant about the price and I would never pay Lull or Sadowsky what they are asking for a jazz bass, the value just isn't there for me.

I think it's just that these are the most expensive production Stingray we have ever seen. In the before times you could walk out of Guitar Center with a beautiful Old Smoothie or Stingray Classic for $1800, and the prices have just been running away since then. The Retro also costs more than basically every BFR, and I'm not sure why? I own one BFR and I would put it head to head with any other bass out there, it's that good. And was significantly cheaper than this.

I'm still probably going to get one of these though.
 
There is no way to know how "worth it" these will be until someone has one in their hands and can give an honest review. I recall a video (maybe the Smoothie 40th anniversary) where Sterling said he doesn't do reissues. I guess that has changed. Ultimately, the good of the company and it's employees dictate what items need to be created and sold. I have no doubt that any product from EBMM won't be anything but stellar.
 
I don’t know if any of you have tried to take a square on photo of several basses
...
It’s especially true of apparent inconsistencies in string alignment on basses - I would suggest a misaligned bridge
...

Yes I have, and I fully understand the problem. I did some work as a photographer documenting old buildings and architecture many years ago - if you think a few basses are tricky ...

Anyway, it isn't the bridge but the control plate. It is clearly out of alignment. A few degrees of parallax and slightly skewed perspective can't distort the appearance of flat things in the same plane to that extent. There is no angle from which I can view my StingRay and make it look like this:
upload_2023-11-2_7-0-18.png

upload_2023-11-2_6-52-14.png
 
$3,200 seems a lot for something that reincarnates a number of the original design flaws and outdated features that have been consigned to the 'fixed' list over the years:
  • Original bridge geometry where the strings have to bend past the intonation screws;
  • Bullet truss adjustment;
  • 3-bolt neck joint;
  • 7.5" fingerboard radius.
Maybe these are features I have a personal dislike for, but IME they are all objectively inferior to later incarnations of the StingRay, up to and including the Special. I will concede it is nice to see the 2-band back on the cards but that is a more subjective preference - there is nothing objectively 'better' or 'worse' over the 3-band or the revoiced 'Special'. It is also nice to see the compensated nut being dropped, but again that is a personal preference.

But with all that said, is it my eyes or does the control plate here look out of alignment. I don't remember any StingRay model where the curves of the plate and body don't conform to each other:
View attachment 5237550
I'd like to think it is part of the website 'mockup', but it also looks that way in these captures from the promo video. Maybe these are also CGI but I find it hard to believe such an obvious thing would get past any technical review. If this is an actual instrument, at $3,200 it is inexcusable, IMHO:
View attachment 5237553
View attachment 5237552

The control plates were positioned this way during early production in 1976.
 
Folks are probably sick of me saying it, but every time I see the new prices, it makes me wish I had kept that original I bought for $250 back in the late Eighties.

One of several reasons I still have mine. Bought it slightly used in '83 (if memory serves) for $300. With OHS case.
20170217_203419.jpg
 
Last edited:
One of several reasons I still have mine. Bought it slightly used in '83 (if memory serves) for $300. With OHS case.
View attachment 5238348

It’s a beauty. Although it will never be worth what a Stingray is, my history of regretting selling cool basses is why I will never sell my Peavey Forum Five AX. I know if I bought an equivalent new American made factory bass, it would be $2,200-$3,000, and my Peavey was a gift.
 
The genuine ones are nothing special. Had a 77 Ray which was a dog. Ive played Subs that are just as good.
I have two US SUBs: a '04 5 string and '05 4 string. I have contemplated selling them when a good priced Stingray pops up, but these are so good that it's nearly impossible to justify the price difference.
Plus, they are 2EQ slabs, so they are much like the original recipe Stingray, which I prefer, anyway.
 
Kind of perplexing with all the effort to be pure 'Retro' they ship with Super Slinky Rounds:)

Well... strings are fairly cheap (except TIs). Pick your poison and slap 'em on there. I rarely buy a bass that I don't immediately change the strings on. Even if they are string brands I like, they are often deader than doornails. I've always wondered if they put "factory second" strings on new basses. They nearly always manage to suck. Of course, if the new bass has been hanging in a music store... forget it. Automatic string change time.