The stoner\doom\sludge\desert\whatever moniker some seem to cover an awful lot of ground. Some bands are just metal bands that don't like the baggage that goes along with that. It also seems like if a band is trying to sound like something from the 70s, they are called a doom or stoner band because...I don't know...weed and B horror movies about witches were popular in the 70s?Agreed, that label doesn't really apply to them at this point (nor a lot of bands somehow situated in the subgenre). There was good discussion on TB recently about labels and subgenres and, at the end of the day, labels can be helpful in seeking out new music, but also harmful and limiting for both the band in listener. For example; one may not like, say, My Dying Bride, yet they see the doom label associated with them, so they assume they wont like Candlemass or St Vitus. (which would be a bummer, because those bands rule)
Khemmis' first album was definitely more inline with the typical stoner\doom sort of album (if there really is such a thing.) The second and third are a little more what I would call musically aspirational. Everyone has their preference; mine is for structure, memorability, and either solid riffs or technical skill. The risk for me as a fan is that they go the way of Sword or Opeth and basically stop being a metal band in any real way. However, as a musician and as a fan, I have to accept that every band has their own journey and they have to make themselves happy.
