• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stoner/Doom Bassists Thread Part Ten - What is this thread about again?

Congrats! Post it on up in the Guild Club thread too!

I've decided to pick up Mandolin, not very DOOM but cool non the less,I recently acquired an old 50's Kay Mandolin for free. I wish it was electric, because I'd plug her in and see how she screams with walls of fuzz, but when it's free, take what you can get.
 
That can all be achieved in one pedal with a few footswitches.

One foot switch for selecting between gain and tone settings (like a channel selector) then a switch for tone bypass. Plus the standard on/off switch.

interesting, so you would set up those switches to select predetermined circuit with capacitors and resistors to set the gain and tone to a fixed amount instead of a pot?
 
That is not ok. One must have an unnecessarily firm opinion and spitefully look down upon anyone who doesn't share it.





;)

I think quite a few active basses sound good. I like Stingrays and Bongos as far as sound goes. Same with Warwicks, Spectors, and this Schecter Scorpion I played once.

But I'm too dumb for active basses. If I'm too stupid to check batteries in my pedals, getting a bass that needs batteries would be a bad idea. I know myself, you see.

Also, I like the way my passive basses sound better even than any active bass I've played. Not because they are passive, as I like their sound better than any other passives I've played, too.
 
bassboysam said:
Oh, even better, would each channel have an independent distortion/fuzz control too? I would imagine they would need to.

Maybe I'll hire you for a little project

Sorry, I meant sustain and tone controls. Volume would effect both channels. So far this is just a thought experiment. I'd have to spend a little time working out the feasibility.