• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Great Bass Preamp/DI Comparison

You remind me of Everett Lynch from Criminal Minds.
latest?cb=20200108232954.jpg

He's a vicious serial killer.
 

Jonesing for an Oracle. If only I could justify the purchase haha :)

I see on the oracle there's an HPF...thoughts on running one before compression vs after? I know you've often had a Broughton HPF on the front of your chain. Seems I used to see it more in past photos of your rig(s) than more recent ones. Just curious if it's handled with your preamps or moving away from it, etc.
 
Is this your new preamp of choice?

The Oracle is killer. So right now in the preamp space I have the following:
Oracle
Noble
Atomic Bass Box
NUX Melvin Lee Davis
Retrospec Squeezebox
Sushi Particle Accelerator
Onkart TurboTore (a sweet parametric that could serve as a preamp)
DSM Bass Simplifier

I recently had the Grace Alix but sold it to fund getting an Oracle back. I sold the Oracle to get the Noble... but immediately missed the Oracle.

All of these devices are interesting and enjoyable in their own way. People have been asking me for a Noble and Oracle direct comparison so I plan to do that.
 
Jonesing for an Oracle. If only I could justify the purchase haha :)

I see on the oracle there's an HPF...thoughts on running one before compression vs after? I know you've often had a Broughton HPF on the front of your chain. Seems I used to see it more in past photos of your rig(s) than more recent ones. Just curious if it's handled with your preamps or moving away from it, etc.

I don't use a stand alone HPF anymore since I'm not using any cabs. The venues I am playing all tend to have the ability to apply a HPF to my signal if need be, but most have multi-arrays and subs so the HPF is less of a necessity. Devices like the Noble and Bass Box and Oracle have onboard HPF type functions and I tend to keep them at end of chain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ekfritz and jdc866
I don't use a stand alone HPF anymore since I'm not using any cabs. The venues I am playing all tend to have the ability to apply a HPF to my signal if need be, but most have multi-arrays and subs so the HPF is less of a necessity. Devices like the Noble and Bass Box and Oracle have onboard HPF type functions and I tend to keep them at end of chain.

Gotcha. Have you experienced any benefit on compression using the HPF in front?
 
Gotcha. Have you experienced any benefit on compression using the HPF in front?
Not at all what you asked, but I also found some benefit in using my HPF/LPF at the front of my chain when using overdrives. It gives more mid presence to the drive(s). If I had more than one, I'd have one at the beginning and end of my chain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdc866
There can be some benefit because you are eliminating low frequencies that could cause a compressor to more aggressively activate. If available pedalboard space were no issue putting a HPF at the beginning of the chain and cutting out 40hz and below could be helpful.

Perfect that's what I was thinking.

I switch a few basses and the U•Bass is a bit boomy. Plus I also have a 6 I swap in occasionally. Thought that might clean it up a bit.

Thanks!