TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sincere thanks for your post. I happen to agree with every word in it.Nice! I've never had a post of mine here on TB so thoroughly dissected. Well done, sir!
Look, I just find The Orville kind of fun to watch and don't over analyze it. I don't expect much from the show so I'm rarely disappointed. My goal for the show is to be entertained, and for that, mission accomplished. Is it art in its highest form? Certainly not. Is it a decent show? Sure, for me.
I do enjoy this thread. I find it interesting, and sometimes amusing, to see what those that are much more into Star Trek style shows than me think about it.
No hidden point, just what I wrote. Face value.And your point?
Ah, I feel ya. Well, actually I'm somewhere in the middle. Save for a couple weak (IMO) episodes I'm enjoying the show very much...until they 1) crack jokes, 2) reference the 20th/21st centuries (as the original Star Trek very often did, sure, but The Orville should either be judged for its own merits or not - can't have it both ways), or 3) both, as is often the case. Then they lose me, only to re-gain me as soon as the entertaining sci-fi plot and competent (enough) acting resume. Oh well. As you implied, patchy (IMO) science fiction on TV is better than no science fiction at all.Huge Trek fan here and also a huge Seth fan as well. I couldn't wait for this show to air but since airing I can barely make it through an episode. I keep watching it though because I love scifi so much and I'll take what I can get but I cringe through most of it.
Well that's pretty much a given.No hidden point, just what I wrote. Face value.
Oh, so you were wondering about the very last line. That need be read in the context of the whole post.Well that's pretty much a given.
I wasn't stating historical fact, but opinion.
(Statement of fact)
That should be obvious by the context
(Statement of opinion--but beyond an opinion of preference)
Save for a couple weak (IMO) episodes I'm enjoying the show very much...until they 1) crack jokes, 2) reference the 20th/21st centuries (as the original Star Trek very often did, sure, but The Orville should either be judged for its own merits or not - can't have it both ways), or 3) both, as is often the case. Then they lose me, only to re-gain me as soon as the entertaining sci-fi plot and competent (enough) acting resume.
That just annoyed me. The character isn't portrayed as brilliant but he was being entirely too stupid for suspension of disbelief. He wasn't new to the ship. He understands they're the aliens amongst people who don't know aliens exist. The character is basically there for comic relief but twerking on a statue that could be the leader of their civilization for all they know is something a misbehaved child might've done, not an officer. They could've found a less ridiculous way for him to go on trial. It's a small part of the point of the episode and the idea of a total democracy like that was really interesting, but it was still a bad writing choice.For TNG, it's a chance to explore the moral implications of "The Prime Directive". For The Orville, when a crew member jokingly twerks a statue of a revered hero on a planet with instant direct democracy and it's captured on video, it's an opportunity to examine how pop culture (particularly social media) might affect an entire society.
That just annoyed me. The character isn't portrayed as brilliant but he was being entirely too stupid for suspension of disbelief. He wasn't new to the ship. He understands they're the aliens amongst people who don't know aliens exist. The character is basically there for comic relief but twerking on a statue that could be the leader of their civilization for all they know is something a misbehaved child might've done, not an officer. They could've found a less ridiculous way for him to go on trial. It's a small part of the point of the episode and the idea of a total democracy like that was really interesting, but it was still a bad writing choice.
I was watching the episode and it was making me mad. Like what the hell are you doing? How about some discretion? He honestly should've been booted out if not court martialed. That's how unbelievably (literally) idiotic he was being.I'm glad you pointed this out. There have been numerous "writing choices" during this first season which have instantly struck me as dubious. I hope it's just a result of the writers being unsure what they're going for as a team and the quality control isn't quite up to speed yet. If that's true, then we should see the stories become smoother in the next season.
I know this isn't a ST franchise and it's totally independent, but I think there are some generic comparisons to be made. The first season of TNG was mostly mediocre for me. There were a few really good episodes and more than a few bad ones, but mostly they just suffered from the writers' inability to know what the characters were supposed to be. There were many examples of bad writing choices that make me roll my eyes in disbelief watching reruns. It took until the 3rd season before the show really got good and they ironed out most of those wrinkles.
TOS had a similar first season. A few really good ones, and a lot of clunkers. The second season is widely regarded as the best overall. My understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) is that TOS had its budget slashed for the 3rd sesaon and was shoved into bad time slots and then poorly advertised. This effectively killed the show for a fourth season which is right when it should have really come into its own had it been supported by the network properly. This is such a loss to the history of SF because I can imagine what TOS would have become had it had a chance to run for 250 episodes or so.
I think just the pilot, the others asked if they could keep bringing soft drinks to the bridge like the previous Captain allowed. And then there is the ex wifeI wasn't that bothered by the grinding on a statue. This isn't star fleet. These aren't upstanding officers, they're Mercer's friends that he asked to be on his crew.
I wasn't that bothered by the grinding on a statue. This isn't star fleet. These aren't upstanding officers, they're Mercer's friends that he asked to be on his crew.
That just annoyed me. The character isn't portrayed as brilliant but he was being entirely too stupid for suspension of disbelief. He wasn't new to the ship. He understands they're the aliens amongst people who don't know aliens exist. The character is basically there for comic relief but twerking on a statue that could be the leader of their civilization for all they know is something a misbehaved child might've done, not an officer. They could've found a less ridiculous way for him to go on trial. It's a small part of the point of the episode and the idea of a total democracy like that was really interesting, but it was still a bad writing choice.
How serious can you take a show where Mercer spits a marble back onto his commanding officer's desk in the first scene?

