Not to be a buzzkill but...
Looking at the solids, I'm not seeing the most important element for me.....a reason to buy one.
They look "okay", but not inspiring. They prolly sound good, but so do hundreds of other inexpensive passive basses.
Is there some special wiring circuit, yet to be revealed at NAMM? Some innovative twist to make them sound special or distinctive in some way?
Personally (and that's all anyone's opinion can ever be), I'd have rather seen the cost of the blingblocks applied to the elecs, instead. Two, tappable, twin-coil pickups (ala the Houser), for example. Substance over marketing bling, for me. YMMV
Show me a reason to dump upwards of a grand on one of these, because I can get a LOT for that money elsewhere.
Still, I remain open to the possibility that there may be some unrevealed wow factor. Meanwhile, let's don't drink too much koolaide just yet.
Looking at the solids, I'm not seeing the most important element for me.....a reason to buy one.
They look "okay", but not inspiring. They prolly sound good, but so do hundreds of other inexpensive passive basses.
Is there some special wiring circuit, yet to be revealed at NAMM? Some innovative twist to make them sound special or distinctive in some way?
Personally (and that's all anyone's opinion can ever be), I'd have rather seen the cost of the blingblocks applied to the elecs, instead. Two, tappable, twin-coil pickups (ala the Houser), for example. Substance over marketing bling, for me. YMMV
Show me a reason to dump upwards of a grand on one of these, because I can get a LOT for that money elsewhere.
Still, I remain open to the possibility that there may be some unrevealed wow factor. Meanwhile, let's don't drink too much koolaide just yet.
