What can I say? Claims like this just seem a bit... silly. It's 2.5mm. That's the width of a slice of cheese. I doubt you could detect the difference without calipers.
Believe you me, I KNOW SILLY.
But there is a time and a place for everything.
So anyway, if that is true [a player cannot tell the difference], why should Fender even bother even making two different neck widths anymore ?
Nobody should care.
Nor should bassists have the
right to care, I reckon, if you are correct in your analysis.
~
This is not a $5000 custom instrument that took 6 months to build to your precise specs, it's a sub-$200 mass-produced instrument from a budget brand.
I don't know about you, but I expect my next Wendy's Junior Bacon Cheeseburger to taste like the last one which I bought from them, and as a consumer spending money, I expect both burgers to be as advertised.
And I only pay $2.29 Canadian for one of those, which, BTW, includes a slice of cheese, albeit processed cheese.
If my next JBC tasted like a Big Mac, I'd be just as grumpy and outspoken about it.
~
Do you really expect a 28.6" neck to be identical as a 34" neck, just because they're both branded "Precision"? I may be wrong, but that seems highly unlikely. If you are really that sensitive, wouldn't the Mini neck drive you nuts in the first place, even if it had a 1.6" nut?
Maybe, but I have felt OK playing basses with 30" scales with wider nuts [Hofner, Gibson], and my 1974 Ric [bought new that year] has a 1.6875" nut, so it kinda set my standard back then.
I have tried other basses, both over the early years and in the recent past, and those with 1.5" nuts are simply uncomfortable to me, both in a physical sense to the muscles of my hand, and in that they are an unexpected change to my brain.
It's whatever you are accustomed to holding in your hands and playing.
~
And...
expectations have a huge impact on these types of subjective experiences, right down to the neurological level. As in, if you have convinced yourself that the difference between a new J and P neck is HUGE!!! and it turns out that the
exclusive difference is 0.1" at the nut then your perception is going to be influenced by your expectations. (And yes, I'm well aware this may be influencing my own evaluation of this instrument.)
So again, why did a company such as Fender offer a choice of neck widths in the first place, if it really doesn't matter ?
~
If Fender was getting measurements wrong on dozens of instruments per year, we'd know it.
Would we ?
There could be other discrepancies in their products, waiting to be unearthed by observant TB members.
For ME, the trust in this once great company is blown, and if I ever consider another Fender instrument, I will have someone go and measure it before placing the order, or bring a measuring tape along if I am visiting a store.
~
If you paid $5000 and waited 6 months for a custom build with your dream specs, then you can justifiably freak out over a 0.1" difference. With a sub-$200 instrument...?
No, both should be as advertised.
Consumers deserve no less.
Again, see what I said about the budget-priced burger.
I'd be willing to pay an extra hundred dollars for this bass, if they'd build what they SAID that they were building.
OR, if they simply had published the correct spec for what they ARE building, that would be OK too, though moreso for those who are comfortable with a Fender Jazz width of neck, and in that case, I would have muttered a single
"Meh", a month or so ago, and have moved on....
~