so I just listened to the slampeg audio clips an really it sounds great. I like very last clip the most where it seemed like the low end was mroe there but still has the tube sound when playing. So which one has the more powerful tone shaping qualities an retains the low end a little more. Maybe compresses the
Signal will be the one I go with I think. I wish the UA had those clips but from
Reading the past posts it doesn’t seem like they are polar opposites the last clip that I like of the slampeg the most has the gain at 9 which was right about where I’d be maybe a hair more but not much more gain. So hoping UA is a little cleaner more less gain more of the cut an eq shaping. My ocd gets the best of me when buying pedal but I’m know
Ima love either one these pedals as they both from what I’m hearing can do the clean tube breakup sound no prob… I kinda dig the ultra hi an ultra low setting of the slampeg…. But I’m sure the UA can’t be to diff
To date...the current gen UA, with the Tone Stack defeat switch is my fav of the SBFX pedals. Someday I'm trying a VenusX... I'm prepared to be blown away...
After reading up a bit... you're after an F2B thing ? The UA is a clear pick. .. and if you buy two, you can simulate the cascaded channel thing the Alembic does but unlike the Alembic, you can switch one channel in or out. I did that for a few gigs winter 2023. I am usually a 2 basses on stage guy.
It was more common for me to use one for each of two basses and feed L&R of an HX Stomp.
I had a real clear clean Chris Hillman sound using a Starfire with BiSonics - truly lovely. I did a more trad Fender Plus a little hair on the other with a Schecter Shorty P (Banshee bass with a std wind Fralin). Two flavors of Yes Mam! I'll have more of that thank you. Almost an embarrassment of riches.
Last edited:
