It's marketing the instruments to make money. It's a business move, plain and simple.
He's invested in making money.
He's invested in making money.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And that’s bad how?It's marketing the instruments to make money. It's a business move, plain and simple.
He's invested in making money.
It's marketing the instruments to make money. It's a business move, plain and simple.
He's invested in making money.
That's it, and there needn't be any more to it than that. Make no mistake, he's making money, and in it for the money, but he has altruistic motives he is successfully fulfilling as well. It's making a difference in the entire market, to be honest - other mfger'ers have to respond, altruism or no, to the price / value proposition that MM is offering. It's fairly compelling as a consumer, I must say. More bang for the buck than anything out there, as far as I know (though I haven't checked PRS' latest budget guitar line).Had it occurred to anyone that these aren't "signature" instruments in the way we typically use that term? It could just be that Marcus Miller is invested in getting quality instruments to people at a decent price and is happy to put his name on that endeavour as a whole?
And why wouldn't he be? It's always a great price when your mum buys it for you.It could just be that Marcus Miller is invested in getting quality instruments to people at a decent price and is happy to put his name on that endeavour as a whole?
lolz whut? Was it really necessary to bring up his mum?And why wouldn't he be? It's always a great price when your mum buys it for you.
I'm not suggesting that's bad in any way, I just don't buy into the idea that this is some sort of altruistic endeavor for Marcus, that's all marketing speak, IMHO.And that’s bad how?
I guess this thread is about to devolve into an “endorsements bad, only for the money” thing now.
Too bad….
None needed, it's obvious and there's nothing wrong with it.Citation needed...
Ain't he famous for playing the J bass his mum bought him for years after he made a name for himself?lolz whut? Was it really necessary to bring up his mum?
Sounds like that might be true, if his mom bought his beloved early 70's J. Nothing wrong with that, neither. Kind of sweet of his mom.Ain't he famous for playing the J bass his mum bought him for years after he made a name for himself?
None needed, it's obvious and there's nothing wrong with it.
Well if Sire thinks that's the best way to sell basses.... Be interested to know how much money Mr Miller makes off having his name on there now.I don't begrudge him making money with his endorsements at all. (I'm simply not a fan of mis name emblazoned on the headstock larger that the brand name, but whatever...)
Whatever.Writing opinions in italics doesn't make them facts...
Exactly, and do you think Larry and Marcus have their names attached to those products for nothing?Its just the way Sire does things. Sire is the parent company and the guitars are all branded Larry Carlton and the basses are all branded Marcus Miller.

Because people need to feel good about their heroes.Exactly, and do you think Larry and Marcus have their names attached to those products for nothing?
No, it's a business arrangement. Marcus has done it with Markbass, DR, Dunlop, SWR....
Good for him, don't know why there's an argument about it...![]()
Good for him, don't know why there's an argument about it...![]()