• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

some kind of Bird….
upload_2023-4-3_14-52-58.jpeg
 
The chrome/nickel Chinabuckers are vintage-y A5. Maybe what they mean is these retrofit Epi style pups are TB+ clones under those covers…?

Yes, I think that is what they are saying. The ceramic magnet version, not the Chinabuckers with chrome covers. I made the wrong comparison in my previous post.
 
Yes, I believe they are. Same as Chinabuckers in Epi covers?
I suspect this is exactly what they are - either EY Tbird pickups (metal can ChinaBuckers) in Eppi covers or more likely, the exposed pole EY Tbird pickup inside an Eppi cover. In either case, EY pickups are not bad pickups at all for the price.

For the record, I did pull the center ChinaBucker pickup out of the BlingBird and temporarily replaced it with an Eppi VP pickup. And although there was a difference between the two pickups, they’re pretty close in sound and volume. The ChinaBucker had a bit more top end and maybe an hair less bottom end as the VP and a little less detail in the notes. For the price, the EY ChinaBuckers aren’t a bad pickup at all.
 
Here’s the Lace pickup info…
View attachment 5020168

IIRC @Gaolee has these in one of his basses. He claimed they are unique sounding and hard to describe because they just don’t sound like anything else. I had planned on buying a set to drop in one of my Goths along with a preamp, but I’m probably months away from that happening. You might be able to find sound clips on YouTube or elsewhere in the Talkbass threads.
They behave oddly as well. The get more scooped the closer they are to the strings.
 
  1. I bought a VP and compared the Probuckers to my mahogany body P with roasted maple neck and Chinabuckers. Curious about your take. Mine is difficult because of bolt on vs neck through.

Overall, maybe more lows/low mids on Chinabuckers, slightly more mids/upper mids and slightly more growl on ProBuckers.

The notes seem to jump off the VP, and it is more sensitive/responsive to plucking location, much like P's I've played. The ThunderP is less sensitive to plucking location, which is good because I like to anchor on the neck PUP, and Chinabuckers provide a very vintagey fundamental very well suited to 50s to 70s Classic Rock. The VP really covers 80s and up (think Cult, etc.) Both can do it all though. The VP still retains a little hair in the lows, the Chinabucker can get a little creamier.

This is with about an hour of comparison, and playing Gimme Three Step, Little Devil, and Come Together. All that said, I won't be changing the PUPs in either bass. I traded ProBuckers to another TBer, and am waiting for his input (he has 2 VPs, putting Chinabuckers in 1 of them).