• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

No lightening bolts from my ThunderCaster project, but it will shoot thunder out of its output jack. It’s still a work in progress but if I can finish it before the GTG I’ll bring it to Hollister. In preliminary testing it even shames a Greco on the bottom end.

What pickups were those?
 
Since I have Marshall's Studio just sitting here minding its own business, I decided to record it vs. a CP to see if the TB+ pickups really sound the same. Of course, two different strings will impact that but WTH...

(Studio IV)

(CP)

As always, excuse the hack job by a broken down hockey goon.

very cool… both sound good, prefer the Studio’s tone but seems like the CP sits better in the mix…
 
Since I have Marshall's Studio just sitting here minding its own business, I decided to record it vs. a CP to see if the TB+ pickups really sound the same. Of course, two different strings will impact that but WTH...

(Studio IV)

(CP)

As always, excuse the hack job by a broken down hockey goon.

Cool, but yeah, too hard to tell with different strings. They can drastically change tone. But I just saw this the other day.

 
very cool… both sound good, prefer the Studio’s tone but seems like the CP sits better in the mix…
The difference in the Studio is the action is really low, pickups are really high, and round wounds. It plays really hot. One thing I did notice is turning up the Tone doesn't really affect the volume, where as, turning up the tone on any of my Epi's really increases the volume.
 
What a day here, that’s the northern edge of the Olympic mountains above Pt. Angeles. Slice of heaven
7DAA6B04-B288-4473-BEDA-76F189D16012.jpeg
 
Since I have Marshall's Studio just sitting here minding its own business, I decided to record it vs. a CP to see if the TB+ pickups really sound the same. Of course, two different strings will impact that but WTH...

(Studio IV)

(CP)

As always, excuse the hack job by a broken down hockey goon.

Both sound very good. The Studio seems to have more attack and the CP seems to bed into the song better, but overall very similar. With identical strings they would both sound much closer I’m sure.
 
Last edited:
Both sound very good. The Studio seems to have more attack and the CP seems to bed into the sing better, but overall very similar. With identical strings they would both sound much closer I’m sure.
I bet it would be about the same difference as between my 2013 Reverse and 2013 NR. Biggest difference is neck-through and set-neck. Tonal difference is minimal. I think the NR is slightly ballsier.
 
Last edited:
It’s very shallow even a bit more so than our old Gibson’s
And the incredible neck on my ‘15. My BaCH’s neck is close to my ‘02 Ibenez EDB500 and ‘86 Peavy Foundation with a skinny ‘93 neck. Both of those basses play great. I need to get a set of calipers…. Although I’ve never found a bass neck I couldn’t be comfortable with.
 
there will be more BaCHs than Gibsons..:D….I remember you commenting on the neck of my IV (BaCH) favorably comparing it to that of your 64 at this little shindig….
View attachment 5067551
Owning a BaCH Thunderbird is recommended for all club members. If you don’t like the pickup, change it. Very much well worth the investment.
 

Latest posts