TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The added toggle switch is to activate the LED's, which for a limited time you could have added to any Wal.
ah yes, i forgot about that..... perhaps that's whyIs Martin Sims the same person behind Enfield Basses?

Actually it wasn't a limited time. Prior to Paul taking the reigns of electric wood, Wal was in collaboration with Martin Sims. Pete had LEDs as an option and sent it to SIMs during the build. If you look at the Wal data base you can see quite a few Wals with SIMs LEDs. (Both my black Wals have SIMs LEDs). After Pete stepped down cause of his health and Paul took over, Paul took that option off - reasons unknown.
(not mine, but sure looks cool)
![]()
![]()
As far as signature, it was probably the original owner who had it built. From what I'm aware off, I was the fourth owner. Last owner was originally from the UK who no longer played bass, but lived here in the states. Don't know much passed that though :/
Any guesses to what the surname in the signature says? I can't understand the handwriting.
I was going to google the name the name to see if I could find more info on this Mk1....not a huge deal if it's a dead end.. just my curiosity kicking in.
I looked in the Wal data bass, but this serial number isn't in there.
some day I will join this club...
Congrats, Lang! I agree about the tone. Very unique! When Jim sold me his W3619 MkI (pics at the beginning of this Part IV thread), I only knew what the Wal sounded like on Rush, Tool, and Failure albums. But it wasn't until I showed up to audition it, when Jim first played it through his MB400+ tube head, that I realized just HOW unique and undeniably Wal the tone really is! I've read where people have tweaked their heart and souls out to emulate this tone, but it's amazing when it's the real thing exactly how effortlessly that tone comes out. I'm also a fellow SWR player. The Goliath Sr 6x10 is a cab to recon with. I recently played the Wal through my new Peavey VB-3 head and my trusty Goliath III 4-ohm 4x10" cabinet. Tube amps LOVE the Wal! Push the 12AX7 Gain on that 550x and it also sounds great! Welcome to the club!!I'm very proud to say that I'm the new owner of W2458 - 1984 Wal Mk1. I have owned many basses over the years chasing the tone in my head and I have finally found it! I would like to thank Brad "bdgotoh" for being honest and helpful during the whole process which included shipping from Seattle to Sydney Australia.
I hadn't played a Wal before, but loved the sound so much that I thought after lots of research, I would take the plunge. As soon as I picked the Wal up out of the case after opening the box, it felt like I had come home.....the neck felt like it was made for me and the body sat just right. After a tweak and a tune.....the tone....almost beyond belief far exceeding my expectations.
My only regret was that I didn't know about Wal basses years ago!
![]()
![]()
May I have a club number?
Congrats, Lang! I agree about the tone. Very unique! When Jim sold me his W3619 MkI (pics at the beginning of this Part IV thread), I only knew what the Wal sounded like on Rush, Tool, and Failure albums. But it wasn't until I showed up to audition it, when Jim first played it through his MB400+ tube head, that I realized just HOW unique and undeniably Wal the tone really is! I've read where people have tweaked their heart and souls out to emulate this tone, but it's amazing when it's the real thing exactly how effortlessly that tone comes out. I'm also a fellow SWR player. The Goliath Sr 6x10 is a cab to recon with. I recently played the Wal through my new Peavey VB-3 head and my trusty Goliath III 4-ohm 4x10" cabinet. Tube amps LOVE the Wal! Push the 12AX7 Gain on that 550x and it also sounds great! Welcome to the club!!
Until recently I had a SCongrats, Lang! I agree about the tone. Very unique! When Jim sold me his W3619 MkI (pics at the beginning of this Part IV thread), I only knew what the Wal sounded like on Rush, Tool, and Failure albums. But it wasn't until I showed up to audition it, when Jim first played it through his MB400+ tube head, that I realized just HOW unique and undeniably Wal the tone really is! I've read where people have tweaked their heart and souls out to emulate this tone, but it's amazing when it's the real thing exactly how effortlessly that tone comes out. I'm also a fellow SWR player. The Goliath Sr 6x10 is a cab to recon with. I recently played the Wal through my new Peavey VB-3 head and my trusty Goliath III 4-ohm 4x10" cabinet. Tube amps LOVE the Wal! Push the 12AX7 Gain on that 550x and it also sounds great! Welcome to the club!!
Congrats, Lang! I agree about the tone. Very unique! When Jim sold me his W3619 MkI (pics at the beginning of this Part IV thread), I only knew what the Wal sounded like on Rush, Tool, and Failure albums. But it wasn't until I showed up to audition it, when Jim first played it through his MB400+ tube head, that I realized just HOW unique and undeniably Wal the tone really is! I've read where people have tweaked their heart and souls out to emulate this tone, but it's amazing when it's the real thing exactly how effortlessly that tone comes out. I'm also a fellow SWR player. The Goliath Sr 6x10 is a cab to recon with. I recently played the Wal through my new Peavey VB-3 head and my trusty Goliath III 4-ohm 4x10" cabinet. Tube amps LOVE the Wal! Push the 12AX7 Gain on that 550x and it also sounds great! Welcome to the club!!
In regards to the Wal Pro I and Pro II...I have read everything I can find and understand that the switches under each pickup are series/parallel, but was wondering if the tone controls on the Pro I and Pro II are just regular passive tone controls.
I see that there was a reissue in the late 80's of some Pro I basses that had a passive tone circuit... I assume the original series had the same?
I understand all the different models offered in the original Pro series, but I didn't know all the extra details about the later Pro type single pickup only models. Cool. I was only referring to the later Pro type single pickup basses as I saw it written that the tone control was passive, but can't find a description of the original passive Pro models tone controls.The original 78-81 Pro Bass could be ordered in either passive or active(E), and either single pickup or dual pickup.
The other model in the 80's called the Pro was only offered in passive and you only got one pickup, but your choice was to have it in either the neck position or the bridge position. It wasn't a reissue as it looked nothing like the original Pro...it also had no body contours. seems they just reused an existing name.
For anyone interested, I decided
to go with the light flame facing he suggested. I like that it's subtle and even though I was originally thinking Birdseye, I like this one.