I love the look of that black Pro/Custom. If it's the one that was (briefly) in the Bass Gallery a while back it's apparently nice and lightweight, too.
Me too. Unfortunately he won't ship it
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I love the look of that black Pro/Custom. If it's the one that was (briefly) in the Bass Gallery a while back it's apparently nice and lightweight, too.
Europe, Pro2e for €5500
WAL PRO II IE - #7241912 - su Mercatino Musicale in Bassi Elettrici 4 corde
One of the 1st Mk1 Customs on basschat
Wal Mk 1 / Custom 1980
I briefly owned that Pro2e and lets just say it has some issues... thankfully I got a full refund
Well maybe I was niave but when someone is selling something on a platform like Reverb I expect the description to be accurate. The bass had plenty of dings and scratches, cracks in the varnish, none of which were mentioned or photographed. The volume pot was broken and poorly repaired. Most of the pots were scratchy and the switches too. The middle switch was almost impossible to use because it was so difficult to switch positions. Many of the plastic posts that connect the PCB to the underside of the pickguard were broken.Hard to imagine a 44 year old bass that doesn't have something going on.
Whats wrong with it?
I had assumed he just didn't have such good eye sight as I do as he was quick to refund me. but given that he has relisted the bass without any mention of the issues I have listed(and I provided him with a detailed description of the issues and photos) I think he might not be totally honest...Geez, that's terrible. Did the seller fake the pics, or just avoid the problem areas? I think you've convinced me (for anything expensive) before final sale to ask sellers for a fresh set of pics at angles I describe, with either a time stamp or a printout from a news site in the pics so I know they are current. If Wals were more common I guess they'd often be local sales where you can check things out.
Holy cr&pWell maybe I was niave but when someone is selling something on a platform like Reverb I expect the description to be accurate. The bass had plenty of dings and scratches, cracks in the varnish, none of which were mentioned or photographed. The volume pot was broken and poorly repaired. Most of the pots were scratchy and the switches too. The middle switch was almost impossible to use because it was so difficult to switch positions. Many of the plastic posts that connect the PCB to the underside of the pickguard were broken.
The action was so high it was almost unplayable in the upper registers. I made a 2mm shim which helped with this but then only exposed that the frets needed a dressing to get the action anywhere near acceptable.
Not what I was expecting after spending 7000€ for a bass described as being in excellent condition!
I'd like some perspective from folks who either swap necks or own two necks. Being seemingly hopelessly torn between fretted and fretless ahead of finalizing my Mk1 order specs when my turn in the queue comes, I'm considering just getting two necks. If I go this route, what sort of setup issues should I expect when I do a swap? If I stick with one neck most of the time and do occasional swaps with the other, how should I store the unused neck? Anything else I should consider?
I see some discussion of similar topics in the Wal thread, such as what it would take (or if it's possible) to swap one Wal model neck with another (i.e. Mk2 and Mk1) but didn't come across much about same-model swaps and best practices there. Thanks all for any advice or experiences you'd like to share!
I asked this during construction of my own Mk2, and Paul simply advised me not to order separate fretted and fretless necks as he mentioned most people never switch their necks, and the extra ends up being completely forgotten. However, in the event I was willing, the idea was basically the same as Mike's response - in that he'd try to fit them as best as possible.