I like number one, then two actuallyThat crossed my mind as well….very good point….
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I like number one, then two actuallyThat crossed my mind as well….very good point….
Over the moon today to have received some facings options from Paul. I am looking at standard walnut facings for a fretless Mk1. The third option below probably draws me the most; but the more plain grain on the second option is handsome too. Curious what y’all folks might think.
View attachment 5217731View attachment 5217730 View attachment 5217729View attachment 5217728
Great point on impact of gloss vs satin …. I’ve been planning on satin.If you go glossy 1 3 and 4 figuring could come up very nice (each in its own way, but it would), but if you’re going satin…… definitely number 2, classic and classy!
Must be just the images Paul had on hand, he told me to disregard that detail.Option 2 for me. Why are option 1,3 and 4 mk2 shapes and option 2 mk1 shape?
The top frets of the Mk2 are reachable, but nearly as reachable as they are the Mk3.
Thanks. I am not sure what you are saying though. You mean the top frets on a mk3 are better reachable than on a mk2? Are they still easily reachable on a mk2 though?
Thank you for sharing, if I was ordering a Mk2 or 3, #4 would be my pick. For a MK1 #2 is easily my favorite.Over the moon today to have received some facings options from Paul. I am looking at standard walnut facings for a fretless Mk1. The third option below probably draws me the most; but the more plain grain on the second option is handsome too. Curious what y’all folks might think.
View attachment 5217731View attachment 5217730 View attachment 5217729View attachment 5217728
Yes, and yes. The are reachable on the Mk2, though not that easily because of the neck heel. They are more reachable on the Mk3.
Yes. The Mk2 has the big block heel and metal neck play that you have to reach around to get at those highest frets.
The Mk3 has a deeper cut low cutaway, and the neck heel has no neck plate and so has more of a rounded angle sculpture rather than a rectangular block.
View attachment 5219075
Yes, you can have a Mk3 heel ordered on a Mk2, but the lower cutaway still isn't as deep as the one on a Mk3.
Gaby was awesome! She was posting it on behalf of her husband. I did a web meeting with her and her husband and they are the best! Glad that it is the States now!Club# 207 goes to BostonJazz72 (that's apparently not in Boston!)
It's a beaut! and am glad to see it's legit...so many were doubting this lady's ad, but she was answering all the questions everyone asked.
I dig #2, that’s a sweet piece of Walnut!Over the moon today to have received some facings options from Paul. I am looking at standard walnut facings for a fretless Mk1. The third option below probably draws me the most; but the more plain grain on the second option is handsome too. Curious what y’all folks might think.
View attachment 5217731View attachment 5217730 View attachment 5217729View attachment 5217728