• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why have a nice rig just to be run direct?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think its been said in this thread before... 9 times out of 10 when I'm playing festival gigs or touring I'm going through a DI. There isn't time to mess around with mic'ing. By all means go for it guys if you have the opportunity/gig that calls for it. All I know is that I need to get a great sound in a hurry. I've spent thousands of hours the least 10 years practicing technique and working on getting the best sound I can. IMO the most important link to getting a good tone is your hands. I buy gear that helps amplify that sound when I'm not playing through a DI/FOH.
 
i don't play huge gigs nor do i care to but my SVT was a life long dream of mine and i'm keeping it forever. i use a wireless during sound check and stand by the mixer. most of the time in the places i play we do a sound check to get our stage volume then go to the FOH from there. i have never worked with a sound man/woman that was uncooperative and the ones that are new or just don't know what they're doing i try to teach them what i know about sound and have helped many and learned a lot. i feel that it's all in the way you approach a situation as to what the end result will be. act like an arrogant ass and you will normally be treated like crap.
 
For big rooms I make myself balance with our stage mix, unless told specifically by FOH that I'm too loud for what they're doing, then I adjust and most likely our guys will ask for more bass in their monitors on other parts of the stage. 90% of the time my 'comfy zone' in terms of volume doesn't cause problems. Being in the reggae world, I get a bit more leeway on my volume than some other genres, and there's not a whole lot else stepping in my frequency neighborhood. Worse comes to worse, I can angle my setup across stage a bit more.

I can only think of one time last year in a theater gig where I was told to bring my stage volume down and I spent our whole (luckily short) set smiling and nodding and not hearing a single damn note I was playing. One other time I used a shared backline (Markbass 500w head/12" combo with matching extension) and I spent all night trying to find a place on stage where I could hear it comfortably. That wasn't the soundman's problem that was a too small a rig problem. In those situations I might as well just sit on the bass amp and try to feel what I'm doing.

I smile either way though. :) That's the work part of things.
Your average reggae bass has less leeway than most. Perhaps if you cranked your hpf on your rig they wouldn't have killed all your stage volume.
 
A genuine question for people who use cabinet mics -- do you use a cats cradle (vibration isolating) mount for the mic, like shown in the photo of cabinet measurements?

I've had problems with suspended stages where the bass cab vibrates the stage and this is picked up through the mic stand, which can give a nasty boomy resonant peak around 100-200Hz -- happens sometimes but not others, is sensitive to exact positioning of mic and cab on the stage, or even where the bass player is standing nearby (acts as a damper). A cats cradle mount cures this, but I've rarely seen them used.

+1
 
Ha! We've had this argument before Jim. And my mind hasn't changed at all. There are a couple things that SOME bass players do NOT get.

1) Physics. "Your sound" is not going to produce the same way through massive 2-18 subs, 2-15 mids, and massive horns the same way it comes out of a sealed 8-10. So it will not even CLOSELY resemble what is coming out of your amp, EVEN IF you mic it.
Wow, Two, and here I thought we vibed ;)

I have proven this wrong many times on a variety of PA's from cabs on sticks to arena-sized line arrays. And I've said it many many times in this thread alone. All that needs to happen is the soundman to realize that what comes out of my amp is what it needs to sound like in the PA, and you're good.

2) Context. "Your sound" may sound like the left hand of God on a 20 foot Steinway (with just the right amount of angelic fuzz) in your bedroom, your practice room, even on your album. But "your sound" may just sound like a 5 gallon bucket of steaming crap in the mix, through the PA, in a club that has all the acoustics of a small gym.
My sound is always awesome and befitting the band and venue, even if the gear I'm forced to play on fly gigs isn't ;) But since you know a bit about my background, I'm sure you meant it for the newbs.

3) Business. MY REPUTATION is ALSO on the line when I run sound for you. And many club owners, band members, and even music fans think that we are magicians. If something sounds horrible, WHO are they going to look at with that annoying "What the ****" look on their faces? Not the guy with the 15 distortion pedals running into the 15 gigawatt amp and 7 8-10 cabs. They are going to look at ME! So, I DO have somewhat of an obligation to protect MY company, MY reputation, and MY mix. Especially if I am running sound for more than one band, I have potential customers standing around the room all night. And, again, they are doing long division in their heads. If something sounds "wrong" they think I suck...... simple as that. But, I can't polish a turd. Crap in = crap out. And if I can help it, crap out is not an option.
Actually, in situations where the sound has been poor, the band is usually blamed for it by the public at large. I once had a singer who performed under his own name tell me, "When the music and sound is good, they always say, 'Man, you've got a great band.' But when they're not, the people say, 'Man, that ____ _____ sucks."" And he's right.

I do sympathize with you to a degree. However, my problem with your line of thought comes when the soundman makes snap judgments based on the looks of the gear or the mere wanting of something a little different than the norm. I've wheeled in an SVT and a mic only to have soundmen tell me, "Oh great, you're one of THEM." Meanwhile I'm probably the quietest bass player they ever worked with. And that's where I have the problem. Guilty till proven innocent seems to be the order of the day.

So, sure, some sound guys have not learned anything new since 1983, and have bad attitudes as well. But it is the HEIGHT of overgrown 4 year old whiney wussy EGO TRIPPING DIVA-hood for ANY musician to simply say "I don't care WHAT you think. This is MY SOUND. YOU make it work."
I once had a buddy of mine who ran sound for Rick Derringer at a club, and Rick told him, "I set my amps the way I want, and if it's too loud or too soft, sorry but that's what I want onstage." I certainly wouldn't have the balls to tell Rick otherwise. That's where you get into "producing" the band rather than "running their sound." They could have very good reasons for wanting what they want, and a soundman shouldn't be editorializing. Not that big a problem for me because I'm pretty cooperative, but I've had soundmen tell me similar things only to have them trash the sound I'm going for because it doesn't fit their mold of what's good.

So, your comments will have lots of fans here in the bass universe. But in context, they aren't very useful at all. All that being said, I understand you have tons of experience and talent. And I am sure you are also smart. But I also (based on several threads) think you are going through a bit of a chip on your shoulder stage over having "played it safe" and pretty much "did what you were told to get work" for most of your career. I get it. You are encouraging young players do "do your own thing" and "don't let anyone tell you any different". There is some wisdom in that as well.

But, there HAS to be some middle ground between the direction your knee jerks and the direction mine does. :D
Sorry, but that's just crazy talk. If a dude has a sound that's mid scooped with a whole lot of lows and highs, there just might be a reason for it. And you don't have to get it as the soundman, but if you don't get them that sound, it will ruin their band. For example, Fieldy. Fieldy has a sound I don't dig and neither do a lot of bassists and soundmen, but it works for Korn and that's what he and they want the bass to sound like, and if you change it, a major dynamic of the band's sound is lost. John Entwistle was another one...soundmen used to tell him that kind of thing for years because they just didn't get that he was looking for a particular sound. Chris Squire fought similar battles. I wouldn't have the balls to them they're screwing their band. Would you?
 
I think its been said in this thread before... 9 times out of 10 when I'm playing festival gigs or touring I'm going through a DI. There isn't time to mess around with mic'ing. By all means go for it guys if you have the opportunity/gig that calls for it. All I know is that I need to get a great sound in a hurry. I've spent thousands of hours the least 10 years practicing technique and working on getting the best sound I can. IMO the most important link to getting a good tone is your hands. I buy gear that helps amplify that sound when I'm not playing through a DI/FOH.
That's fine...for you. But if a soundman can't get a good sound out of a mic'ed rig with a nice mic designed for bass cabs as quickly as a $40 DI that's stored in the bottom of a milk crate full of junk, then I'm not blaming the mic. I might blame the bassist if he/she has a really hideous sound, but who am I to judge if their sound is hideous or perfect for the band they're in?
 
Originally Posted by squeezer:
A genuine question for people who use cabinet mics -- do you use a cats cradle (vibration isolating) mount for the mic, like shown in the photo of cabinet measurements?

Not even once in my life, and I've never once had this problem.
 
...and soundmen would complain about having to mic the singer.

And there's your problem. You see it as our (sound guys) COMPLAINING. And as long as YOU go at it with THAT chip on your shoulder, and whatever sound guy you are working with has HIS chip on his shoulder, you will get nowhere fast. But, just remember, the sound guy will win every time. Because while you are on stage playing, he can make you sound like crap no matter what and there isn't a THING you can do about it.
 
And there's your problem. You see it as our (sound guys) COMPLAINING. And as long as YOU go at it with THAT chip on your shoulder, and whatever sound guy you are working with has HIS chip on his shoulder, you will get nowhere fast. But, just remember, the sound guy will win every time. Because while you are on stage playing, he can make you sound like crap no matter what and there isn't a THING you can do about it.
Except badmouth him to everyone who will listen, including people who might be needing the services of a soundman in the near future. Or maybe make an onstage announcement like, "Sorry folks, we know the sound is bad, but see that guy sitting by the soundboard? We're trying to sound good for you but he's doing his best to ruin it by being completely uncooperative."

Good luck with that one, dude.
 
And there's your problem. You see it as our (sound guys) COMPLAINING. And as long as YOU go at it with THAT chip on your shoulder, and whatever sound guy you are working with has HIS chip on his shoulder, you will get nowhere fast. But, just remember, the sound guy will win every time. Because while you are on stage playing, he can make you sound like crap no matter what and there isn't a THING you can do about it.


I actually get along quite nicely with soundmen for the most part. But then, I've played in the area for 30 years now, so I know most of the decent ones. I spend a lot of time talking actual gear with them, and (including recently, like last week) have even done work on their gear, helped them troubleshoot problems and so forth. I've been known to take one for the team (on a regular basis if needed) and play with nearly ZERO stage volume when someone can't figure out their game enough that they're worried about a pre-EQ DI and an underpowered bass rig with two lil' 10 inch speakers on a theater stage in a medium sized room.

That doesn't mean that many soundmen are the geniuses you think they are. Witness me having to explain to a soundman the other day that he wasn't getting monitors because he hadn't plugged in the amp...or the speakons. Or on another night where sound decided to let me know that my stacked 15's would sound way better side-by-side because they form a 'sine wave' when stacked...never mind me complaining that the electricity in the venue had the grounds dangerously switched on half the outlets and that putting amps on the same circuit as the lasers and smoke machines was one of the problems with noise he was having.

I occasionally get the call and fill in on sound in a pinch when asked. I hate to do it because it's crappy work and I'd rather be on stage or at home than behind a board, but hey... you're the one who picked the job, not me.

And really, a soundman making you SOUND like crap often has absolutely nothing you've said or done. He may have had too many drinks at the bar, had a fight with his girlfriend, gotten a parking ticket, or in the case of one guy I knew, had blown out his hearing so much that his mixes were so terribly unbalanced ALL the time.
 
And there's your problem. You see it as our (sound guys) COMPLAINING. And as long as YOU go at it with THAT chip on your shoulder, and whatever sound guy you are working with has HIS chip on his shoulder, you will get nowhere fast. But, just remember, the sound guy will win every time. Because while you are on stage playing, he can make you sound like crap no matter what and there isn't a THING you can do about it.

I think you may be mistaken on two accounts. First, we've all encountered good and bad sound guys, but more often than not, we've encountered the bad variety that don't care, and think a bass is a bass is a bass, a guitar is a guitar is a guitar, drum is a drum is a drum, etc. So many don't go into it with a chip on their shoulder, they go in with expectations, and most are extremely personal expectations. They've worked hard to develop a signature sound that they want to hear, that is "their sound" and to have someone ignore that and do whatever they want to do is a fairly hefty slap in the face.

And the second place I think you're mistaken is, most of us have a say in who gets rehired for sound. So, while the sound guy might get the last word for the night, the last word in the conversation comes from the band and the bass player. And believe me, I've ended my fair share of working relationships with sound men based on their thought process that every band should sound like THEY want them to sound, and not like the band wants to sound.
 
Except badmouth him to everyone who will listen, including people who might be needing the services of a soundman in the near future. Or maybe make an onstage announcement like, "Sorry folks, we know the sound is bad, but see that guy sitting by the soundboard? We're trying to sound good for you but he's doing his best to ruin it by being completely uncooperative."

Good luck with that one, dude.

Or Jimmy, you may have seen my FB post a few weeks ago when the soundman couldn't get the front end up and running for our first set and I eventually turned around the monitors, we 'mixed' with amp levels for the room and all the vocals were handled by the monitor wedges pointed at the crowd. It saved the night, but yeah...that soundman? probably won't see him in the room again. :rolleyes:

I've rewired boards for guys when they couldn't figure out what was going on (why on earth would anyone decide to parallel the mains to the monitor amps rather than using a send (?)).
 
Two things Jimmy. I'm sure your sound is great. I'm sure you are a seasoned pro. I am mainly talking about guys who think they have amazing tone and are really producing a noise that is non workable.

Also I am NOT one of those sound guys with a chip on his shoulder. I get along with everybody. I am simply saying that I UNDERSTAND where some of them are coming from..... kind of a devil's advocate. Being a bassist in particular I try to hook my fellow bass players up with melodic thunder.

Also I would NEVER sabotage a band's sound. I was simply warning those here with an ax to grind that perhaps a more diplomatic approach is in order to avoid potentially passing off those who WOULD sabotage their sound out of spite. I have heard some stories from associates of mine.

I guess I am really trying to encourage bass players to at least use a respectful tone and try to calmly negotiate FIRST. Sometimes a sound guy has your best interest in mind but his social skis are ...... lacking. I would say that on average a sound guy's social skills are about as good as the average bass players fashion sense. And that ain't good.

OK that was 3 things.
 
That's fine...for you. But if a soundman can't get a good sound out of a mic'ed rig with a nice mic designed for bass cabs as quickly as a $40 DI that's stored in the bottom of a milk crate full of junk, then I'm not blaming the mic. I might blame the bassist if he/she has a really hideous sound, but who am I to judge if their sound is hideous or perfect for the band they're in?

We both make livings playing music. So which one of us is right ;)

And I always carry my own DI. Never once have I been asked to use another one. Jimmy your approach is totally cool for what you do. I am not a rock musician. I primarily play Jazz/R&B/Funk and theatre/cruiseship gigs where my own requirements are different. This thread will go around in circles for ever as we all have our own opinions based on our experiences. To someone who might be just starting out I think its important to gather as much information as possible without taking a single response as gospel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.