TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Finally, yeah, no: to suggest that the joke could have been intended or taken as a compliment (because of the comparison therein) is either not well-thought - sorry - or disingenuous. By no means should a comedian be physically attacked for their jokes, but please, let's call it like it is.
You typed "We live in a time when many people understand that words are equivalent to physical violence"Why?
It was a quote from an interview in portuguese translated by Google for English.You typed "We live in a time when many people understand that words are equivalent to physical violence"
Words are NOT the equivalent of physical violence, it's absurd on it's face and an entirely false statement. Not picking a fight just stating the obvious...
It was a quote from an interview in portuguese translated by Google for English.
Maybe I'm missing something in the translation, but I completely agree with you.
What I meant by quoting that sentence is that some people seem to think they can respond to words with violence, which, of course, they can not.
Does the sentence in English imply the contrary?
Don't be, because I didn't, and, well, as I said, it's either of two possibilities.Sorry if you took offense to my comments... but I still believe what I said.
Yes the translation does imply the contrary.It was a quote from an interview in portuguese translated by Google for English.
Maybe I'm missing something in the translation, but I completely agree with you.
What I meant by quoting that sentence is that some people seem to think they can respond to words with violence, which, of course, they can not.
Does the sentence in English imply the contrary?

Nicely played.I'm not buying any of this, did they dust Rock's cheek for Fresh Prints?![]()
Well, Bob Hope has hosted the Oscars nineteen times (more than anyone else), beginning in 1940. There might have been other comedians before him but I'm not sure. Comedians make a pretty obvious choice as hosts: they are used to working in front of crowds, they are used to engaging directly with crowds, they are typically comfortable with a degree of improvisation and they tend to help with the entertainment aspect of the ceremony. And, of course, there's a long tradition of comedy in film. It's unlikely that the trend of hiring comedians as hosts for the Oscars is going to fade any time soon. Heck, this year two of the three hosts were comedians (Chris Rock wasn't a host, just a presenter).I love David Spades genius assessment, that this was a slap in the face to comedy. Yes. Try to get a clue.
Simple solution: don't let comedians host the awards. When did this stupid trend start anyways
The majority of the people at the event agreed. Will got a standing ovation.
Standing ovation.
April fools ?Breaking News:
L.A. county Sheriff went to arrest Smith & he threw a tantrum, as well as his wife.
He's now locked up for the weekend!
He threw his wife? I thought he was all about defending her.Breaking News:
L.A. county Sheriff went to arrest Smith & he threw a tantrum, as well as his wife.
He's now locked up for the weekend!
Meaning his wife threw a tantrum as well.He threw his wife? I thought he was all about defending her.
It was a joke.Meaning his wife threw a tantrum as well.