• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Will Smith just threw a $50m punch

Even the pretense of "classiness" has been completely absent from the celebrity machine for at least the last 20 years. Nothing left but starlets on the red carpet with their assets hanging out and their unsavory escorts. At least when Debbie, Eddie, Liz, Mike, and Dick engaged in various adulteries they PRETENDED to behave like adults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
Finally, yeah, no: to suggest that the joke could have been intended or taken as a compliment (because of the comparison therein) is either not well-thought - sorry - or disingenuous. By no means should a comedian be physically attacked for their jokes, but please, let's call it like it is.

Sorry if you took offense to my comments... but I still believe what I said.
 
You typed "We live in a time when many people understand that words are equivalent to physical violence"

Words are NOT the equivalent of physical violence, it's absurd on it's face and an entirely false statement. Not picking a fight just stating the obvious...
It was a quote from an interview in portuguese translated by Google for English.

Maybe I'm missing something in the translation, but I completely agree with you.

What I meant by quoting that sentence is that some people seem to think they can respond to words with violence, which, of course, they can not.

Does the sentence in English imply the contrary?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WG Plum and C Stone
It was a quote from an interview in portuguese translated by Google for English.

Maybe I'm missing something in the translation, but I completely agree with you.

What I meant by quoting that sentence is that some people seem to think they can respond to words with violence, which, of course, they can not.

Does the sentence in English imply the contrary?

No, it was quite understandable in context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WG Plum and J_Bass
It was a quote from an interview in portuguese translated by Google for English.

Maybe I'm missing something in the translation, but I completely agree with you.

What I meant by quoting that sentence is that some people seem to think they can respond to words with violence, which, of course, they can not.

Does the sentence in English imply the contrary?
Yes the translation does imply the contrary. :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: J_Bass
I love David Spades genius assessment, that this was a slap in the face to comedy. Yes. Try to get a clue.

Simple solution: don't let comedians host the awards. When did this stupid trend start anyways

The majority of the people at the event agreed. Will got a standing ovation.

Standing ovation.
Well, Bob Hope has hosted the Oscars nineteen times (more than anyone else), beginning in 1940. There might have been other comedians before him but I'm not sure. Comedians make a pretty obvious choice as hosts: they are used to working in front of crowds, they are used to engaging directly with crowds, they are typically comfortable with a degree of improvisation and they tend to help with the entertainment aspect of the ceremony. And, of course, there's a long tradition of comedy in film. It's unlikely that the trend of hiring comedians as hosts for the Oscars is going to fade any time soon. Heck, this year two of the three hosts were comedians (Chris Rock wasn't a host, just a presenter).

As for the standing ovation, I wouldn't be too quick to draw any conclusions from that.
 
277806567_4966370956775536_5119216699238023851_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plake