TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm like that but with my Super Bassman and V4B.
I had a blues/jazz gig last night &just find it hard to go without the SLAM that the 6x6550s bring.
Sadly. . I haven't used my V4B for a while.
I'll make sure I do. ..and soon
Probably the only criticism of the Heritage is that it needs a bit more tweaking than the V-4B - knobs at noon is a bit dark (dare i say muddy ?) for my tastes when playing finger style - fine for pick. The v-4 B was set and forget great tone at noon. Need to boost the mids a bit and roll the bass off quite a bit on the new one - but I am wondering if that's due to the 212 being ported ?
I thought the honeymoon with my V-4B/212Av would never end....
But a few weeks ago I got a new Heritage SVT-CL - a shop was letting it go for $3300 (bear in mind retail is Australia for a SVT Heritage is between $4200 and $5200) I could't resist and picked it up to run through my 212AV.
Well, as much as I have loved my V-4B, the honeymoon is over but there are plenty of fond memories. There are countless threads/posts asking "SVT or V-4B ?" Having been able to A-B them with ample time, I can safely say there is no contest for my money. Tonally, they tread the same ground, albeit with different tweaks to the EQ. But there's a gravity and weight to the SVT that the V-4B can't touch. And knowing I can't ever run out of headroom is a bonus - after reading so many threads and posts myself asking "Is the V-4B loud enough..?" I can safely say it was for my needs, with some limitations on clean headroom. But when you put down the cash for an SVT CL/VR/Heritage, you know you are never going to ask that question.
Probably the only criticism of the Heritage is that it needs a bit more tweaking than the V-4B - knobs at noon is a bit dark (dare i say muddy ?) for my tastes when playing finger style - fine for pick. The v-4 B was set and forget great tone at noon. Need to boost the mids a bit and roll the bass off quite a bit on the new one - but I am wondering if that's due to the 212 being ported ?
Oh, and of course, insert the usual gripe of having to carry and move the damn thing - but only having the 212, I don't have to lift it above waist height which is a good thing.
Odd place to be reviewing an SVT, I know, but figured people trawling through for info on the V-4B might find this comparison useful.
While I'm here, any idea where I could get some Heritage grill cloth for my 212AV ? Fliptops and the usual suspects don't sell it and can't seem to find any way to buy it online from Loud from Australia.
I thought the honeymoon with my V-4B/212Av would never end....
But a few weeks ago I got a new Heritage SVT-CL - a shop was letting it go for $3300 (bear in mind retail is Australia for a SVT Heritage is between $4200 and $5200) I could't resist and picked it up to run through my 212AV.
Well, as much as I have loved my V-4B, the honeymoon is over but there are plenty of fond memories. There are countless threads/posts asking "SVT or V-4B ?" Having been able to A-B them with ample time, I can safely say there is no contest for my money. Tonally, they tread the same ground, albeit with different tweaks to the EQ. But there's a gravity and weight to the SVT that the V-4B can't touch. And knowing I can't ever run out of headroom is a bonus - after reading so many threads and posts myself asking "Is the V-4B loud enough..?" I can safely say it was for my needs, with some limitations on clean headroom. But when you put down the cash for an SVT CL/VR/Heritage, you know you are never going to ask that question.
Probably the only criticism of the Heritage is that it needs a bit more tweaking than the V-4B - knobs at noon is a bit dark (dare i say muddy ?) for my tastes when playing finger style - fine for pick. The v-4 B was set and forget great tone at noon. Need to boost the mids a bit and roll the bass off quite a bit on the new one - but I am wondering if that's due to the 212 being ported ?
Oh, and of course, insert the usual gripe of having to carry and move the damn thing - but only having the 212, I don't have to lift it above waist height which is a good thing.
Odd place to be reviewing an SVT, I know, but figured people trawling through for info on the V-4B might find this comparison useful.
While I'm here, any idea where I could get some Heritage grill cloth for my 212AV ? Fliptops and the usual suspects don't sell it and can't seem to find any way to buy it online from Loud from Australia.
I HATE YOU, signed content V4b owner
You can buy Heritage cloth. Here is info on Ampeg's Australian distributor...Stephen Lane is the guy who runs it. Nice guy, plays bass great!I thought the honeymoon with my V-4B/212Av would never end....
But a few weeks ago I got a new Heritage SVT-CL - a shop was letting it go for $3300 (bear in mind retail is Australia for a SVT Heritage is between $4200 and $5200) I could't resist and picked it up to run through my 212AV.
Well, as much as I have loved my V-4B, the honeymoon is over but there are plenty of fond memories. There are countless threads/posts asking "SVT or V-4B ?" Having been able to A-B them with ample time, I can safely say there is no contest for my money. Tonally, they tread the same ground, albeit with different tweaks to the EQ. But there's a gravity and weight to the SVT that the V-4B can't touch. And knowing I can't ever run out of headroom is a bonus - after reading so many threads and posts myself asking "Is the V-4B loud enough..?" I can safely say it was for my needs, with some limitations on clean headroom. But when you put down the cash for an SVT CL/VR/Heritage, you know you are never going to ask that question.
Probably the only criticism of the Heritage is that it needs a bit more tweaking than the V-4B - knobs at noon is a bit dark (dare i say muddy ?) for my tastes when playing finger style - fine for pick. The v-4 B was set and forget great tone at noon. Need to boost the mids a bit and roll the bass off quite a bit on the new one - but I am wondering if that's due to the 212 being ported ?
Oh, and of course, insert the usual gripe of having to carry and move the damn thing - but only having the 212, I don't have to lift it above waist height which is a good thing.
Odd place to be reviewing an SVT, I know, but figured people trawling through for info on the V-4B might find this comparison useful.
While I'm here, any idea where I could get some Heritage grill cloth for my 212AV ? Fliptops and the usual suspects don't sell it and can't seem to find any way to buy it online from Loud from Australia.
If it's any consolation I have a 73 V4 and 74 SVT (and a pair of 112AV) and while I agree with the assessment that the V4 is a little lighter on the low end heft versus the SVT at the same settings, it's still my go to amp between the two. Different strokes for different folks and all. You'll always wonder if the grass is really greener, but it's hard to go wrong with either.
I agree with what Peter said, except for the part about dialing back the lows on the Flatback. I boost lows in the 210av instead![]()
My biggest reason for doing it is small stage and the side by side hits you at the knees. Not a huge difference on stage if you are 6-10 feet away. But the vertical dispersion could matter out I. The audience.Sorry to cover ground that has likely been covered, Jimmy...
Clearly you are still using the 210av with your V-4B - Is there a particular reason to stand the cabs upright and not put them side by each on the floor like a square 410 type of deal? I tried that on the gig last night and it worked out reasonably well. Are the 210 AV stacked vertically that much better?
My biggest reason for doing it is small stage and the side by side hits you at the knees. Not a huge difference on stage if you are 6-10 feet away. But the vertical dispersion could matter out I. The audience.
I can hear them better, but if you liked it sideways, rock.Sorry to cover ground that has likely been covered, Jimmy...
Clearly you are still using the 210av with your V-4B - Is there a particular reason to stand the cabs upright and not put them side by each on the floor like a square 410 type of deal? I tried that on the gig last night and it worked out reasonably well. Are the 210 AV stacked vertically that much better?
Yup, makes sense. Fortunately I have some room to move around, so I can usually get away from the from of the cabs. The thought of the 210 AV pair stacked vertically never fails to give me the heebee jeebees. By the by, I like your NV115 stack with the V-4B. I bet that sounds good! I ran my late 70s with a single one last weekend and was fairly pleased.
I can hear them better, but if you liked it sideways, rock.
The NVs are awesome without a doubt. I especially like them when using flats, but I love my 210AVs too.
Makes sense, I just worry about a strong breeze knocking them over. I almost never play in a strong breeze, but you get what I mean...

The 212AV has a strong character of its own and the horn is nicely tuned imo - not quite subtle buy very useable for a bit of extra attack. I don't often use mine these days but I was reminded just how nice it is at the weekend when I paired it with a Trace Elliott V4.Haven't heard a bad report re the SVT 212AV & V4B pairing neither.
I KNOW it works really well with my Fender Bassman Pro Neo 115 cabs. ..and, like the 212AV, they're ported. But. ..& I've not played the 212AV. .. they're tuned nicely. .unlike any ported cabs I've had b4. Very punchy and tight. .
But, like a sealed cab, will punch out those lows IF you dial em in. I'm impressed.
I would love to try (have) a 212AV also. .. but. ..
I put it like this...the 4 Pro reminds me more of a V4B or SVT running at its cleanest, and the 7 Pro reminds me more of a V4B or SVT pushed just to the brink of losing cleanliness...it's not dirty, just has a little bit of sag to it. That's sort of how I hear traditional SS with the heavy power transformers vs micros with the SMPS in general. Tighter vs slightly sagging.