• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A New Fender Coronado Bass?????

>…starting bid of $1000 and didn't sell...

Coronado never was a big mass instrument in the first place (I mean no much appeal to most players); then, some are good some not. I drool over one (so much so that I already paid my reissue in full and it will arrive end of october). But I would never bid in the blind on one...

Others in this thread have said they sell between $1200-$1500 typically so if that's what they go for then the starting bid being $1000 shouldn't matter because that was still less than what they sell for and no bid on it
 
>right now... crossed the line...

it happened since quite a few years ago already but passed unnoticed !!! ;)

Invalid Link Removed

start reading from issue 1 at page 94: it's extremely interesting! Reportage continues on following issues... it will help in dismounting any prejudices...
 
by your apparent disgust for the "apple model" do you simply mean building stuff cheaply in china and then selling at a huge profit? because that I can understand. but surely you don't fault companies just for trying to make a profit...? that's not inherently a bad thing.

Yes to your first question. Over-simplified but yes. I have no problem with margins. Nope to your second. It makes no logical sense to take my comment down that path (although a few tried because it's easy to dismiss what I said by doing so; I noticed nobody focused on the rest of what I said).

My point being, ad nauseum, there's no point for me to pay $750 for a Fender when Squier is $300 and I get the same thing. There will be no difference in quality. By that I mean, still good quality...but I would rather get a USA Fender for a few hundred more new and a couple hundred less used. Fender said, "hey, let's make Fenders in China and double the price." 5-10 years ago, these would not have Fender on the headstock. I am not O.K. with that. I won't get into why my opinion is that it's not O.K. because that would take the thread another direction. I'm sure those who have thought-powers know what I'm getting at. People who buy these are paying $300-$400 more for a Fender decal, IMHO. Sort of ironic as many on the forum deride the cult of branding.

In any case, I have begun to stray from Fender anyways as an owner (besides vintage). I still have a fond appreciation for the USA and Japan lines though.
 
Ahhhh great score! I wanted it badly but didn't have the cash! Shoot me a message if you ever want to get rid of it!

I posted this in the starcaster thread, also. Parkway Music in Clifton Park NY currently has a 67 Coronado II in sunburst for $999 with case. The dual thumbrests have been removed and the holes filled, and a thumbrest has been added in-line with the e string. I'm not in the market for one, and I don't know if they sell online, but it couldn't hurt to ask. Or if you're anywhere close to the capital district ny area it may be worth a trip.
 
...anybody having any clue about possible delivery of first Coronados in the shops anywhere on the planet please be good and post it here, so I will be legitimated to push Anderton's in England (where I bought my own....) !!!

:D Thanks.

(Cannot simply stay... into my own clothes!!)

:hyper:
 
now, out of the excitement of the first news about a few weeks ago, let's take a moment and think about the real importance of the fact:

Fender is re-entering in the market with a line of electric hollows!!!


Boy this is a real "move" from the mainstream for this company. If I don't recall it wrong, last attempts Fender did about these was with a hollow simil Les Paul / PRS, a Robben Ford signature... am I wrong? I would tend to exclude from the hollow department the chambered Tele Thinline or the MIJ Jazz; just talking about real semihollows / hollows...

Hope that this will be fruitful, business wise, so they will keep the hollow department steady along the time...

;)

(Edit: found a pic of the Robben Ford hollow signature! Beautiful axe!)

Invalid Link Removed
 
Let's please remember that we're not talking about a "Chinese-made" bass ordered through "Made-in-China.com" or "Trade-Key", we're talking about a bass made to spec and ordered by FMIC. As pretty much all of us have seen in other manufactured goods, China is simply a manufacturing base. They have inexpensive labor. They will build your products according to what you order.

If you order "the cheapest possible product to maximize our profit", then they will certainly do so. They will also build superlative, first-rate product if you're willing to pay for it.

Does anyone here seriously believe that Fender would intentionally R&R, design, prototype a couple of brand new hollowbody basses and then order their licensed Chinese manufacturer to "make the cheapest possible product so that we can maximize our profit"?

Of course they stand to make money. But they also have an investment in these new basses, and a chance to penetrate a segment of the market they have not competed in for as long as most people can remember.

I'm guessing that their profit margin percentile on both the Starcaster and the Coronado will be similar to what they currently manage with the CV line of basses. I think we can all agree that manufacturing a semi or full hollowbody bass is more expensive that building a solidbody.

So the belief that somehow we're getting basses that are only worth $300.00 I think misses the mark. I believe that the Starcaster/Coronado series of basses are a premium product which cost much more to make and worth more than the CV and VM series.

Also, I think they will also quickly realize that they need "Fender" branded cases for these new items, or they'll be leaving money on the table. My guess is that there are two different contracts at play here, one for the basses and one for the cases, and there is some kind of production delay on the case side of the equation.

But I could be wrong, and frequently am! IMHO, YRMV, etc. etc. etc.