• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A soundman's rant to younger players.

For the OP
Take a DI post effects and pre EQ and let the player do his thing. He is the artist.

The point is not really how to get the sound.
I work with what the players give me , i have my preferences but I still respect what they fill me up with , Sh** or not.

PreDi , postDI , Mike , XLR , telepathy , I don't really care if the signal is good , clean and fit in the context.
My rant is more about the absence of knowledge of how they will sound in a big PA and not knowing how to blend with their musical partners.
(read arrangement in a lot of cases)

I know that it's the soundman's job to do that too but I read so much thread of bass players crying about how they didn't sound in FOH like they sound in their amps/room/practice space.
I just wanted to show a little bit of the other side of the picture if that is possible.
 
Im curious about my sound as I've bee complimented on my tone from at least a few sound guys. I have a 9 band para on my amp that has a frown/smirk, lol. Bumb in the lower mids and ever so slight hump in the highs. The onboard on my bass also has a mid bump and a lil bit of bass boost highs, stays at 0. Never had a complaint, just wondering if I have a good sound, I play a Lakland 55-01.

I'm sorry, but I can't find the link to the sound clip.

:smug:


From what you've written here, nobody could really tell you if you have a 'good' or 'bad' sound - it offers a visual picture of the EQ curve (on your 9 band, and somewhat the bass) but there are so many other factors involved.
 
Wouldn't this all mean that the best thing to do was to focus on the bare tone from the bass (DI) and preferably having an amp that reflects the tone of my bass as neutral and linear as possible?

Would this make things easier for the soundguy?

I am not really opposed to this, because I have a somewhat purist approach when it comes to sound - my P justs sounds the way it does, and I am thinking to get an amp that just amplifies, without shaping the overall tone in any way (if that's even possible?).
 
The point is not really how to get the sound.
I work with what the players give me , i have my preferences but I still respect what they fill me up with , Sh** or not.

PreDi , postDI , Mike , XLR , telepathy , I don't really care if the signal is good , clean and fit in the context.
My rant is more about the absence of knowledge of how they will sound in a big PA and not knowing how to blend with their musical partners.
(read arrangement in a lot of cases)

I know that it's the soundman's job to do that too but I read so much thread of bass players crying about how they didn't sound in FOH like they sound in their amps/room/practice space.
I just wanted to show a little bit of the other side of the picture if that is possible.

Lol, so your rant is less about tone and more about bad playing technique and poor arrangement?
 
You're right.

If a band don't trust the local soundman to do a good job ,respect the style of music , they should hire their own soundman.
The cases I report here is when I'm mixing ,so the band had a certain level of confidence in me , or else they would hire theirs. That confidence include that they think I can get the appropriate style and mix accordingly.
In the cases where the bands brought their soundman , well , I'm paid to check out the beautiful girls on the streets !:hyper: ( It's an outside gig)
and I'm not commenting on their jobs.

In your case Jimmy , you should DEFINITLY always hire your own soundman if you often face those situations.


You can say it to the guy on the fly/on the spot , and if that is not enough , it is the band's responsabilty to transmit this info to the FOH guy in advance , send a CD , pay him to go to rehersal, etc.....
Again , if you use the local soundman , it's because you didn't hire one and leave him full responsability.


um... just a thought, since you addressed this to younger players.... have you ever maybe thought that the younger players are exactly the same ones who can't afford their own sound guy? Most of us are people with s*%^@y jobs, trying to support ourselves and still manage to pay thousands of dollars for musical gear, recording, production, etc... We're relying on YOU to make us sound good live, but we're also relying on you to take into account that maybe we want to sound like we want to, not like how you want us to sound. I'll be the first to admit that I've never done FOH sound, and I don't have 30 years of experience, but I have spent thousands of dollars and years of time to get my sound to be exactly that- my sound. Maybe instead of just EQing the hell out of it and whining on the internet, you could offer the younger players some advice, say "hey, if you change this, you'll come out in the mix more and your band will sound better". But be prepared that if they try it and say no, then just set up the mic, play with your volume slider, and leave us alone to set our own tone.
 
everything you said is very true. I am inexperienced. I am also at a gig, paid to do my job. That would be to play to the best of my ability.. He'd be at the gig, paid to do his job. That is to make the sound as good as he can, to the best of his ability. all things considered, it shouldn't be a friend or an enemy situation. sadly it is.

*sigh*

It isn't my point that you have to go kiss up to the guy - but if walk into a situation and know that the sound guy tends to be, let's say - "Treble Heavy" - - chat him up. Tell him that your "people" - the audience you brought - really liked the last show BUT thought the mix was a little hot in the high end. Usually - hell, almost always - this guy WANTS to make you happy. He isn't there to be the artist - he's a support guy and he WANTS to do a good job... But with no feedback, what is he supposed to do except go on his own tastes! So give him feedback.

Now, if you've never met the guy - go say hi. If your band tends to really like to have a "Strong mid" voice, tell him. Be friendly and professional - I know, I know - acting like an adult can see SO UNCOOL... but really - in the real world, a show is a workplace. Treat it like that and you'll get farther.
 
*sigh*

It isn't my point that you have to go kiss up to the guy - but if walk into a situation and know that the sound guy tends to be, let's say - "Treble Heavy" - - chat him up. Tell him that your "people" - the audience you brought - really liked the last show BUT thought the mix was a little hot in the high end. Usually - hell, almost always - this guy WANTS to make you happy. He isn't there to be the artist - he's a support guy and he WANTS to do a good job... But with no feedback, what is he supposed to do except go on his own tastes! So give him feedback.

Now, if you've never met the guy - go say hi. If your band tends to really like to have a "Strong mid" voice, tell him. Be friendly and professional - I know, I know - acting like an adult can see SO UNCOOL... but really - in the real world, a show is a workplace. Treat it like that and you'll get farther.

hey, i agree with you - being adult about things is very good.

either way i don't see any gigs for me in the forseeable future, anyway. :bawl:

I'll keep this thread in mind when i do, though
 
.... Maybe instead of just EQing the hell out of it and whining on the internet, you could offer the younger players some advice, say "hey, if you change this, you'll come out in the mix more and your band will sound better". But be prepared that if they try it and say no, then just set up the mic, play with your volume slider, and leave us alone to set our own tone.

I've read on the internet that if you buy a Jaco reissue bass and a 360 you will sound exactly like him.



The reply #1 , last paragraph is a very good advice.
 
The reply #1 , last paragraph is a very good advice.

This:

A tip for younger bass players; if you have any occasion to mix bands from time to time , do it ,live or at home ( if your reference has some low end ! )
It will give you a better picture of your sound and how it needs to "fit" in your band's mix.

Rant over.

This:

IWhat do the youngsters need to do to make the soundguy's job easier?

I always just send a dry signal from my bass and let the sound guy do with it what he will.

Or This?

My rant is ; try to have a knowledge of your band's mix.


There are many ways to have a bass sound but that is a very good one and the one I use as a bass player.

Which last paragraph? Because I actually have let the sound guy run a DI directly out of my bass and do what he wanted with it. Guess what- it sounded like ***. I would only do that if I knew the sound guy personally and knew him very well. I may be an outlier, but I just plain don't trust someone who doesn't know my band and our music extremely well to make us sound good based on his own idea of how we should sound.

If your suggestion is that everyone should try mixing their own music to see how it fits together, thats a great idea. Except for the fact that you already stated- Sound systems differ, and not everyone has a good setup in their bedroom for mixing sound. I happen to be lucky that one of my roommates has put in that money to have a good mixing setup, and you know what I did? I learned how to use it to set up my own amp (which is why I don't like people EQing the hell out of my sound). But as has been said in this very thread and countless others, what you hear in your basement is different from what the audience hears when you're on stage.
 
Forgive me if I'm out of line, but times have changed in the 20 years that you have been a soundman, and the tones that us "kids" like on our basses aren't the same sounds as they were then. We don't all play jazz/synth pop or whatever is your preferred genre :P

Did you even read the OP? He said he was working a JAZZ FESTIVAL. That means the people there were playing JAZZ. So if you don't play JAZZ, then your personal preference is completely irrelevant to this topic because the issue wasn't regarding anything but JAZZ.

And what's the deal with this whole generation war argument? Age has nothing to do with it; knowing what sounds good from a FOH perspective is the issue, and you as a performer have no clue what the FOH mix sounds like at any given time. That's what soundmen are for. If you think you can set the mix from the stage and expect it to sound exactly the same to the audience in an outdoor festival, you apparently haven't ever spoken to an actual soundman about his mixing process.
 
And what's the deal with this whole generation war argument? Age has nothing to do with it; knowing what sounds good from a FOH perspective is the issue, and you as a performer have no clue what the FOH mix sounds like at any given time. That's what soundmen are for. If you think you can set the mix from the stage and expect it to sound exactly the same to the audience in an outdoor festival, you apparently haven't ever spoken to an actual soundman about his mixing process.

Uh... considering the title of the thread, I think thats where the age argument comes in. And it's very possible to know what the audience hears, the only one who can't walk at least a little ways off stage is the drummer.
 
Did you even read the OP? He said he was working a JAZZ FESTIVAL. That means the people there were playing JAZZ. So if you don't play JAZZ, then your personal preference is completely irrelevant to this topic because the issue wasn't regarding anything but JAZZ.

And what's the deal with this whole generation war argument? Age has nothing to do with it; knowing what sounds good from a FOH perspective is the issue, and you as a performer have no clue what the FOH mix sounds like at any given time. That's what soundmen are for. If you think you can set the mix from the stage and expect it to sound exactly the same to the audience in an outdoor festival, you apparently haven't ever spoken to an actual soundman about his mixing process.

Yah, because all jazz bass players sound the same.
:hiding:
 
Very interesting thread. First, let me say I sympathize with both sides, since I've been a gigging musician (on both bass and guitar) for over 30 years, and I'm also a studio rat, having made my living as an engineer for many years as well.

The sound in a live venue or on a recording is a collaboration between the musicians and the sound man, and it takes both sides doing their job well, and working together, for the final product to be the best it can be.

As a player, it's all about context. Whether in the studio or on stage, the sound that works best in the context of the band often sounds pretty crappy on its own, and I highly advise folks to record their gigs, and hear what they really sound like with the band. In most of the places I play these days, most of my sound comes from my rig on the stage. I've done this long enough to know that I have to change my EQ a bit for every place we play. The vast majority of clubs are pretty poor acoustic environments.

As an engineer, you have two bosses. Your job is to help the musicians realize their vision, but you also have to satisfy the folks paying the bills (the club owner, record label, etc. is paying for a certain sound).

If it's an experienced, professional band, you can probably just take your cues from them. A friend of mine, who is a great engineer with many platinum record credits to his name, told me about one of the first sessions he ever did. He was still a teenager, and found himself behind the console in the studio with Jaco on the other side of the glass. My friend is getting things together and Jaco is ready to record, so he asks what the holdup was. My friend told him "Just a minute - I'm getting my sound." Jaco's reply was "I'm F'in' Jaco! It's MY f'in' sound - you just have to hit record!"

If you're working with less experienced folks, or if you know the room's deficiencies really well and the band doesn't, you may have more work to do to tailor their sound. And try telling the bass player "I know you can't hear it on stage, but there's this terrible standing wave at 80 Hz in this place. If you can trim some of your low end, you'll get a lot more definition, and I promise you the bass will still be powerful out front." We're often reasonable people!

And sound men, for goodness sakes, walk around the club and listen from more than one vantage point! I love the control of the studio, so I never did a ton of live mixing, but every now and then, a band that I had recorded would ask me to mix a showcase gig for them. I mixed a show at a club that was pretty famous for big reggae acts, and the sound system always had this huge, pillowy, muddy bass, that worked for that stuff, but was horrible for other music (I saw the Chili Peppers there once, and you heard from Flea was rumble). I vowed I would get a good mix that night, and it was easy to get the low end sounding great, so I wondered what the problem was for these other sound guys. Then I stepped off the mixing platform to walk around the room, and as soon as I did, I got hit with the giant muddy rumble. I spent the next 10 minutes hopping on and off the riser, and was able to dial it in, but for all the shows I saw at that club, had nobody ever stepped off the riser?!

The sound man also has to understand the system. I'm not saying that's the issue with the OP, but a lot of today's systems have way too much power and way too many subs. That's fine for that annoying "slam you in the chest" kick drum that's popular in a lot of music, but it's just wrong for a lot of other music. I saw a triple bill at BB King's in NYC a while back. The first act was Bob Brotzman - killer solo acoustic slide player, who does some percussion stuff on the guitar as well. Every time he hit the guitar, the audience was just crushed with the thump. Next act - the Campbell Brothers - sacred steel based gospel funk/blues. Again, we're just getting killed with low end. I walk around the place to make sure it's not just where I'm sitting, and no, it's everywhere. The 3rd act is Sonny Landreth, and I had just helped record his live record. I didn't want to have a confrontation with the sound guy, but I really wasn't going to enjoy the show with the low end the way it was, so bracing for a battle, I went up to talk to him. As it turned out, I didn't have to give the guy any of my background, or fight about why he should listen to me - the guy was very open. Way better mix for that set.

As an engineer, I've worked with folks who had their acts totally together, and I've worked with folks who needed a lot of coaching. Approached correctly, most folks are pretty open to that. As a player, I've had awesome sound men (the guy at the big outdoor gig going up to every single box and putting a little piece of tape on it. I ask what he's doing and he tells me he's checking the phase on each one and doesn't want to miss any!) and some lousy ones (the guy who "fell asleep" at the board comes to mind). It definitely works best when the band and the sound guy are both good and on the same page.

Excellent post, sir.
This should be a STICKY.
Thank you.
 
Ok, I get what you're saying, and I sympathize, I really do. But I also must say that perhaps the tone these guys have might be ideal for the sound of their band and it would be irresponsable of you to try to change that. I constantly have this battle with sound guys, I have two main tones that I try to achieve, one being a warm P bass kind of sound that sits in the mix and the second tone that has an exagerated high end that is supposed to pop out. I do this with an EQ pedal that I set with the highs and mids boosted and a bit of a volume boost. I use that tone for touch style parts, which in my band is a crucial part of our sound. My problem is, before each gig, I tell the sound guy that I have to have MY tone or the band won't sound right, just trust me. And of course, about 80% of the time, I get on stage to find out that they have EQed my sound so that it blends in to their liking and then when I play the touch style parts it comes out as this aweful, muddy, mess. And I'm left just shaking my head. If you want to talk about bassists making your job harder I can talk to you about sound guys ruining the sound of my band. If you ask me, a sound guys job is to make a band sound as good coming through a PA as they do at home, not to change a bands sound to their own liking.
This. :)
 
while this is true, a person gets used to the equipment they use and can make certain predictions about what the house sounds like through headphones that they're comfortable with. is it 100%? no, of course not. but it's almost always close enough to get started with a good mix and then tweak it out as you go.
 
while this is true, a person gets used to the equipment they use and can make certain predictions about what the house sounds like through headphones that they're comfortable with. is it 100%? no, of course not. but it's almost always close enough to get started with a good mix and then tweak it out as you go.
Then how do you explain big dumb bass in big venue shows, such as Heart and Journey?

I know it's not the same exact subject as mixing off of phones....

But ya know, I'm hearing more than my fair share of garbage sound from so called pro sound engineers lately.

Couple this with the fact that as they (sound engineers) gain experience, they also gain a lot of engineering knowledge and a "know it all" attitude, and I'm increasingly having a tough time finding respect for what they do and what they claim to stand for.

It just seems like so many would rather bludgeon you to death with facts and engineering principles rather than acknowledge their own shortcomings as audio engineers. How does that reconcile with a musician's attitude of always learning, always being open to hearing and trying new things? It doesn't - at least, i can't make it reconcile.

Nope - too often its stuff like: "Don't pair a 4x10 with a 1x15 because it WILL sound like garbage" (Followed by a baffling series of engineering principles and citations that are more designed to stifle opposition than they are to find a good reasonable middle ground) - Even when real players with real experience prove otherwise on a daily basis.
 
i think part of it is what i call the "i paid a lot of money for these subs and i'm gonna use 'em" syndrome. i agree that a lot of concert mixes are a mess on the low end. but it's not the subs' fault. they just do what you tell them to do. instead, it's soundmen who are likely a little too thrilled that they can put out all this low end without struggle, which wasn't always the case.

as for the 410/115 thing, hey, people like what they like and i'm behind them, but the laws of audio reproduction don't change just because you like a piece of gear. for example, i love my 810, even though it beams mids and highs like a son of a b. but i'm at a stage where i'd rather know why it beams so i can make an intelligent choice rather than just have it there because it looks cool and sounds big and not be aware of potential problems with it. spent a long time not knowing about gear, and now that i know a little something here and there, i'm down with educating yourself about it.
 
... and what I will add to the OP's advice to young players is this: Play hard during the sound check (how you usually play with the whole band playing), or the engineer will have to cut your gain when the band comes in

In my experience, unexperienced singers / guitarists / drummers (in decreasing order) are more susceptible to this advice, more than bassists ...... :)