• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ambient/Post-Rock/Textural bass playing thread

Interesting observation, and some developing but unfinished thoughts:

I heard Rick Beato talking about Nu-Metal in a dissection of a Korn track and he mentioned that Nu-Metal lacked the overt blues influence of other hard rock and heavy metal sub-genres. I hadn't thought of that before, but I instantly knew what he meant. Yesterday, I watched a doc on 80-86 era hardcore punk and someone in it commented about how the hardcore scene wasn't "ripping off black music" (safe to assume they meant blues and rock and roll) like artists from the 70's (Zep). I started thinking about how Misfits can straddle the line between rock-n-roll driven horror punk and more hardcore sounding material with their later work, and what makes each style sound the way it does.

This got me thinking about what makes blues "blues" and how it fits in the/my musical world, particularly since I'd say a fair amount of ambient and electronic music doesn't sound bluesy. The swing feel, and heavy back-beat snare, and the use of the blues scale don't seem to present in the same way. I find that interesting because there clearly is a swing feel in electronic stuff (there's usually a swing setting on sequencers and in DAWs), and the flat five and minor third are certainly common enough in what I've listened to, but it still doesn't sound blues derived. Harder industrial stuff like Skinny Puppy seems pretty far removed, but then someone like Uncle Al comes along and pokes a harmonica in a Ministry track and it pops right out. Heck, this thread has our own @dukeorock posting things that don't sound like rock at all, and I wonder how or if he thinks about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theunknowndude
All the years I spent in Legendary Shackshakers I learned a whole lot about blues and love it, but with Prayer Flags or The Snipecatcher stuff, I intentionally try to remove that influence, if only for my own fun. I do use the blues scale in some Snipecatcher bits, but I don’t really reference blues music when writing that stuff
 
The blues influence has been so ingrained in so much of what I grew up listening to that I don’t really even think of much of it as bluesy. But when I listen to nu metal or hardcore punk there’s an element or two missing that takes it out of blues territory. When I think about what’s missing it starts to seem more obvious.

I mean, you can sorta forget that Sabbath is a blues band after you’ve listened to them for a while, but the roots aren’t all that hidden.
 
Last edited:
Maybe that’s why I don’t particularly care for nu-metal. Never thought about it before.

As far as Led Zep ripping off blues artists, they were just following blues tradition. The difference being they made a load of money and the countless blues players who preceded them didn’t.

Well, Willie Dixon did make a lot of money suing Led Zep for ripping off some of his stuff :)
I love LZ actually, but they got caught a few times for getting too close
 
  • Like
Reactions: JES and steubig
Maybe that’s why I don’t particularly care for nu-metal. Never thought about it before.

I never thought about it either. Maybe it’s why hardcore punk didn’t really appeal to me before, though I’m okay with some nu metal. I started running an inventory of bands I like and why, and how it relates to the obviousness of the blues. My listening habits have been rooted in certain styles that seem similar but have some significant differences. Like, Sabbath to Carcass is an understandable progression over time, but Carcass really doesn’t show more traces of blues on their material. Mudvayne is a favorite of mine but they aren’t bluesy or rock based. The slap bass is there, but it isn’t traditionally “funky” like Suicidal can be when Rob slaps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theunknowndude
I didn't get into newer metal (including "nu metal") for the longest time because I grew tired of all the hardcore tough guy posturing thing that pervades the music and the scene. Everyone trying to out-heavy everyone else and so on. Fans who are looking for a fight. Later on there is some of it I like, but much of it seems like the musical equivalent of pro wrestling to me.
 
I freely confess to having almost zero cultural and/or emotional connection to the blues. It's almost like I was born without the gene for appreciating blues music. I definitely listen to and appreciate a lot of music that is very closely related to or influenced by the blues -- Charles Mingus, Ornette Coleman, The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, all manner of early R&B and funk, etc. -- but the closer a tune gets to the traditional archetypal I-IV-V My-Baby-Done-Left-Me paradigm, the harder it is for me to make any connection to the music.

In one of my more smug/clever artistic moments, I even composed a piece called "I Refuse The Blues" ...which is a very strict (albeit abstract) blues number.

So, as per the precceding discussion, I wonder if I might like some Nu Metal due to its absence of blues influence?
Although if Korn, Limp Bizkit, and Kid Rock are the best that genre has to offer, um, no thanks, never mind...
 
but the closer a tune gets to the traditional archetypal I-IV-V My-Baby-Done-Left-Me paradigm, the harder it is for me to make any connection to the music.

...

So, as per the precceding discussion, I wonder if I might like some Nu Metal due to its absence of blues influence?
Although if Korn, Limp Bizkit, and Kid Rock are the best that genre has to offer, um, no thanks, never mind...

to be honest, imo, a lot of what passes for the blues is not particularly interesting.it's been codified and beaten to death so it's mostly lost its *feeling* and become archival.

for me, albert king is way up there (and bb *can* be) . . . **raw** one-chord blues and weird arrangements are what i'm into now, so wolf, muddy, john lee (solo!), charly patton are the guys.

korn basically has about two good albums worth of material stretched over six (or whatever they're up to now).
 
i think bands like metallica definitely veered away from the blues (and no, pentatonic scales don't quality, imo).

Until they didn’t. Discounting Kirk’s soloing scale choices, they certainly had moved more toward modernization and metalification of classical, until the self titled black album. I think the riff-based songs with tempo changes and the snare hit placement kept earlier material from being bluesy. The black album really started to lay into the backbeat along with more traditional song structures and the rhythm section function. Something like Sad But True feels like it’s heading back to rock territory.

I suppose post-rock and new wave and synth wave and various other genres which are a few steps away from “traditional” rock manage to filter that blues influence out. The leap from blues and jazz into early rock and pop is more directly noticeable. Each successive generation chose to embrace or distance certain elements.

It’s interesting to read the thoughts of the usual suspects. We’ve all gravitated toward this thread for various reasons, so I figured everyone would have a different take on how and why they liked the blues/rock/etc influences.
 
Until they didn’t. Discounting Kirk’s soloing scale choices, they certainly had moved more toward modernization and metalification of classical, until the self titled black album. I think the riff-based songs with tempo changes and the snare hit placement kept earlier material from being bluesy. The black album really started to lay into the backbeat along with more traditional song structures and the rhythm section function. Something like Sad But True feels like it’s heading back to rock territory.

I suppose post-rock and new wave and synth wave and various other genres which are a few steps away from “traditional” rock manage to filter that blues influence out. The leap from blues and jazz into early rock and pop is more directly noticeable. Each successive generation chose to embrace or distance certain elements.

It’s interesting to read the thoughts of the usual suspects. We’ve all gravitated toward this thread for various reasons, so I figured everyone would have a different take on how and why they liked the blues/rock/etc influences.

i hear a fair amount of jazz/fusion in bands like animals as leaders and jinjer.

imho, most metal bands (or current rock bands in general) don’t (can’t) swing. when they try, it can be disastrous. it’s not just the back beat.
 
to be honest, imo, a lot of what passes for the blues is not particularly interesting.it's been codified and beaten to death so it's mostly lost its *feeling* and become archival.

for me, albert king is way up there (and bb *can* be) . . . **raw** one-chord blues and weird arrangements are what i'm into now, so wolf, muddy, john lee (solo!), charly patton are the guys.

korn basically has about two good albums worth of material stretched over six (or whatever they're up to now).

Can’t comment on the Korn thing because they’re just a bit lost on me.
Genres, man. I hate it. I love Howlin’ Wolf and I guess it’s blues. Spoonful is one chord and it’s genius. The need to break stuff into genres or styles (I do it too) is a drag. Take ANY so called genre and odds are I only like small portions of each one, so do I not like music? Most of my favorite music doesn’t sit easily into any category. Steve Reich, Tom Waits, Aphex Twin, Cramps, Henry Cow, Eno, even the best Bowie stuff. I dunno...jumped on some weird nerd soapbox and can’t really explain myself :)