• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Backsides of drivers. Is nothing sacred?

Size matters.


  • Total voters
    44
3015 non LF
IMG_0736.JPG
 
Extra points if someone posts an old school, "tube" speaker!

1941 Gibson EH-100 w/field coil speaker:

Link Removed

Someone gave this yard sale refugee to me and I passed it along to another TB'er to restore, as I felt he would be able to do a more authentic job.
 
1941 Gibson EH-100 w/field coil speaker:

Link Removed

Someone gave this yard sale refugee to me and I passed it along to another TB'er to restore, as I felt he would be able to do a more authentic job.
WOWEE!!! Must discuss this single transformer design. What's up with that? Never saw that before.
 
The EH-100 is an interesting amp. The early EH-100 had a transformer instead of a phase inverter, that later version had a tube. This amp did have a power transformer. Some early amps didn't, they ran directly off the line.

Interesting concept where the head fits into the cabinet. Ampeg wasn't the first to do that.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM
Cool info, David, but I don't know if I get it. So this amp of Charlie's...that's the power transformer I see, and instead of an output transformer it uses a phase inverter tube?
 
The phase inverter is often done with a tube. In some older amps juke boxes, Hammond organs, etc, they used a small transformer in place of the tube. The early EH-100 revision has this. This is separate from the output transformer and power transformer. Some amps, not all, have the field coil and the output transformer together. Note all the wires running to the speaker cabinet. It isn't just two. The big transformer is the power transformer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM

Latest posts