I think I get it now ... I was as confused as you seem to be, but I think I have a handle on it now. (I gotta admit some of the comments made about this by that one fella were quite vague, so I'm with ya.)I'd be very appreciative if you or Roger could elaborate on the specifics of how/why setups need to be changed for more accurate cabs.
I think what was meant was that with other cabs things like fret buzz and ~ahem~ .. crappy technique will be more pronounced with Roger's cabs than with other-than-Baeresque cabinets.
With other cabs, your setup (and your technique) may have sounded ok .. passible at the least. But with Roger's box there is a chance that you may have to do a bit better job of instrument setup because fret buzz and/or little clicketyclacks might become more audible. Not because the ML112 is tweetery and clickety, but because many cabs ... even "good name" ones .. are not producing the frequency bandwidths that the ML112 is able to focus on. Consequently, your guitar may be set up so that any problems it may have "live" in those less-pronounced frequency bandwidths of the other cabinets. Switching to Roger's cab is like changing a graphic EQ in a sense. A bandwidth that might have been scooped a bit is now somewhat flatter, perhaps even humped a little. That slightly scooped/attenuated bandwidth was where all of your "nasty bits" were hiding so you didn't hear them when the EQ was scooped a little bit in that area.
Raise the levels of that particular bandwidth and little nasties and such may become more pronounced. This isn't a bad thing, it just means that you need to do a better job of setup. And once you change setup, you may find your technique to be a bit on the a ... hmmm ... how shall I say this delicately .... may be a bit on the CRAPPY SIDE. There, I believe I did that quite eloquently.
It's like turning the lights on when naked.
